unstable reconstructor (class 3 ship)
A class 3 ship which reconstructs 50 class 2 ships but if it is destroyed it takes 75 of your own class 2 down with it
Attack/life: 0/110
Manpower: 110
Researchtime: 2 d
Buildingtime: 12 h
 mycilloid-Technology
Needed research:
gravobionics
Battle details:- fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
- reconstructs 50 ships of any ship-type in your fleet in class 2 (technical LP +1 to ships that have less than 1 LP)
battlemessage: "reconstructed ... ships"
(battle engine syntax: reconst,self,50,2,all,1,reconstructed)
- if this ship gets destroyed by direct firepower it reduces LP to 0 of 75 ships of any ship-type in your own fleet in class 2 but some ships are immune against destruction
battlemessage: "unstable reconstructor destroyed explosion destroys ... ships"
(battle engine syntax: trigger_destruction@destroy,self,75,2,all,unstable reconstructor destroyed explosion destroys )
|
| —> |
Forum Topic about this ship |
| admin: |
kamekaze6 : i really wish there was a half decent class 2 reconstructor so i invented this
http://manual.spacetrace.org/tec.php?details=1&tec_id=1750&techname=unstable%20reconstructor&lang=en
was in a bit of a hurry though and made a mistake, it s supposed to be class 3 i dunno how to discuss it in the forum it s been so long since i invented anything plz take a look and tell me what u think
Fallen Warrior: it is okay but i think it would be better if it was cheaper and class two so it could replace the moblie repair bot wich csn no longer reconstrcut
Nemesis : no it wouldn't.
looks pretty good kame
Anonymous: the mobile repair bot only effects one ship at a time, if u put this in class 2 u d have to pray that it fought after most of ur own.
Anonymous: I like it... It's pretty good!
promethius2: I really like this idea.
I say add it!
kandos -: nice, i like it...
it works!!
WilliamWallace : it is a class3 ship. It saves c2 ships for your next battles. And it is good in costs and manpower.
It is way better then the mrb, cause I think that one leaves a gap in the game. It isnt good enough, just like the minor recon. If we add this, we have a decent c2 recon that isnt too powerfull but just nice.
Greetz
Anonymous : Ya I like it. But how do you invent ships? I have a few ideas that could be put to practical use, and improve the gameplay of Spacetrace.
Anonymous : this ship may upset the delicate balance between classes. fleets would start having larger and larger class two. along with shielding, fleets would start being rather monotary.
Anonymous : fleets already focs on one class most of the time, and just because this ship reconstructs 50 class 2 doesn t mean all mycelloids will build this ship, i have been playing this game for a while now and i have already expressed my feeling s about the fact that there are no class 2 reconstructors and think this is the solution. i beleive this ship has potential, maybe the mp and area of effect needs to be changed but the idea is still there: a ship which reconstructs class alot of class 2 but which could be vulnerable to class 3 attack
WilliamWallace : Yeah, changes are always possible. But Kame, I fully support this idea.
Admin, plz post in the topic and give notice of what u think of it. And plz think it is good. Cause it is.
Spyder : i have been playing this game for a while now and i have already expressed my feeling s about the fact that there are no class 2 reconstructors and think this is the solution . i beleive this ship has potential, maybe the mp and area of effect needs to be changed but the idea is still there: a ship which reconstructs class alot of class 2 but which could be vulnerable to class 3 attack`
Well the combat reconstructor is a class two reconstructor, the minor reconstructor does class 2 ships, ten. I guess you really want to improve it.
Anonymous : the combat reconstructor is in class 2 but it reconstructs class 1 so it s a class 1 reconstructor, the minor rec only reconstructs 10 class 2 that is not enough!
WilliamWallace : Yeah and it is expensive. But that's because it isnt ment to be a mass c2 recon. But we DO need such a ship. guess what, Kame got this good idea that can fill in the gap.
SO PLZ ADD THIS WONDERFUL SHIP
Tweety : The use of the Minor Reconstructor is to protect your higher classes by reconstructing a few ships of lower classes.
Is there a huge class 1 reconstructor??? No.
I havent seen the hint that only one Unstable Reconstructor can be used yet. That means you are able to reconstruct your whole c2! Its unbalanced because if you HAVE to reconstruct your class 2 and the ship is destroyed in the class 3 battle, you wont loose ships, you just cannot reconstruct them.
The reconstructers are very powerful and their only use is to support you by reconstructing a few ships, but not to make your fleets live much longer. The only reason to invent a new and powerful reconstructor is that you want to have less building an flying time --> more possible battles, more possible points. Also, if everyone uses it, its getting unbalanced.
I vote no, but if I must agree on that ship, I would say: Only one can be active and only a few should be placed on a planet.
Anonymous: yes like the major reconstructor, only one of these can be active, u can build more than one but the first one that activates kills the others.as for your comment on class 1 reconstructors not existing, what about combat reconstructor, it s not the first time that i ve flown around with over 100 of these! |
| admin: |
nice ships, it is positioned on a planet
we chdnaged the class error though
it IS class 3 now! |
| Rubens: |
Is someone agree with me? Lets add it as a permanent research, why not? |
| DavAlan: |
I am beginning to like it as a prewarp ship as obtaining it is easier and fasterr than with research and etc. Plus there is hardly time in any evo to research all the really gond ships anymore :| |
| Rubens: |
But for some of us prewarps are really far and we will like to have it in mind at the time of reseatch.it should be researched vry fast |
|  | |
mycilloid-Technology
kazuuula-Technology
human-Technology
