| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
18% |
[ 3 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
25% |
[ 4 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
56% |
[ 9 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 16 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
destroyer 2.0 (class 2 ship)
this universal destroyer was built to deal with every battlesituation.
attack/life: 20/50
manpower: 57
researchtime: 1 d 12 h
buildingtime: 14 h
 nanite-technology
needed research:
improved targeting
battle details:fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
lets all ships fight again, that were not destroyed
(battle engine syntax: restart)
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
robert
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I tried to make this ship balanced, so tell me if it isn't. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Liderant
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 273
Location: Venezuela
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
ok, what is this!!!
it makes all the ships fight again?
if so, I dont see it in the explanation
bad... |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Lou of East from West
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 372
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
lol, just posted wardestroyer, and this showed up too...
Looks more like a light class 3 ship, but quite apstract, it got also a portable campaign ship...
_________________
Duke Lou
MoC of 9 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
robert
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I actually forgot to put that in the description. So, sorry for not putting that in. Thanks for telling me. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Liderant
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 273
Location: Venezuela
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 1:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
your welcome 
what I think is that this ships needs more mp
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Metody I The Evil
Admiral
Joined: 26 Dec 2002
Posts: 1243
Location: Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
And lots of it... It's too powerfull... Just imagine a fleet of those... Every ship fires, than restarts the battle, the ship after it fires, restarts the battle, the first ship... Ooh it sounds like a battle to the end
Even without the restarting bit it's too strong
_________________
_____________________________________________
"Unity creates power"
Khan Kubrat to his 5 sons |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
robert
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Actually, I was only trying to create a desroyer like a Dreadnought only weaker. Ok, I admit the "restart" was a bit much. I got frustrated from trying to create this ship like a dread. Mabye It should have also the ablility to destroy all other destroyer 2.0 in your fleet. Or to recycle all of the destroyer 2.0s in your fleet after fighting twice. Also mabe it should cost a little more mp. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
BladeTech
Admiral
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 1591
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
i think this is way too powerful. and what is it with 57? why not just make it 55 or 60?
...BladeTech |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
robert
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
When I was making this ship, the inventor screen thing said 56 mp was to low, and I thought 60 mp was too high. Maybe it should cost 60 or more mp.
[ This Message was edited by: robert on 2003-11-22 02:24 ] |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
