Recent topics Log in
Search Profile
Memberlist Usergroups
Log in to check your private messages
Register
Mono transister cruiser
Post new topic   Reply to topic
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » New Technology Inventions » Mono transister cruiser
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2003 11:57 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Once again i can't post in the "new Inventions" Please move this to there=) Thanks =)


mono transister cruiser (class 3 ship)
this ship is one of the 2 ships that split from the bi-transmodulator cruiser. this ship is literally half a cruiser, but it has extra upgrades to make it useful. it will attack in formation, but this ship has a quantum transister that enables it to handle more information of enemy positions, there for this ship can shield 5 ships in class3, but at the cost of overloading a few circuts, redusing it life points to 10 and destroying 1 of you own class3.

attack/life: 50/50
manpower: 40

researchtime: 2 d 13 h
buildingtime: 15 h


nanite-technology

battle details:
fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
tries to generate a shield around 5 ships in your fleet in the same class it is fighting
battlemessage: "shielded 5 ships"
(battle engine syntax: shield,5,shielded 5 ships,n)
modifies AP/LP by 0/-40 of 1 mono transister cruiser in your own fleet in the same class
(battle engine syntax: mod,self,1,this,mono transister cruiser,+,0,-40)
multiplies AP and LP by 0/0 of 1 ship of any ship-type in your own fleet in the same class but some ships are immune against destruction
(battle engine syntax: destroy,self,1,this,all)
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
darklim
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela

 Post Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2003 4:04 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Too high cost for only shield ships

_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JaM
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300

 Post Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2003 6:34 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

It destroys 2 ships to shield only 5 ships in class 3, why?
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2003 12:35 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Ahh the points will balance out. As you see, this ship was to go with the tsunami blast ship=)
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Rubens
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422

 Post Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2003 9:13 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

is too good wit hdreaghnauts and can be reconstructed, sure is too dificult but yes or no? again urs ship depend of ur another invents but this sound good. the mp is ok beacuse is too good ith the tsunami but i think if the tsunami is no accepted the mp should be 25-35
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 5:53 am    Post subject:

WHy that low mp? i think its fine. A cruiser is 60, but since when this ship is used in combonation it can be very destructive. So, i raised it by 10.
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » New Technology Inventions » Mono transister cruiser
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Solaris phpBB theme/template by Jakob Persson
Copyright © Jakob Persson 2003



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Impressum