| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
60% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 5 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 4:20 pm Post subject: nandessis (nanite destroy system) |
|
|
nandessis (nanite destroy system) (class 3 ship)
een schip dat 20 klasse 3 schepen vernietigt, en ze onrepareerbaar laat.
attack/life: 0/1
manpower: 1000
researchtime: 1 d
buildingtime: 3 d
 nanite-technology
needed research:
advanced tactics
battle details:fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
modifies LP by -5000 of 10 ships of any ship-type in the enemy fleet in class 3 but some ships and buildings are immune against this effect
(battle engine syntax: kill,enemy,10,3,all) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Bloodmagic
Commander
Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 80
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 5:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bullshit
we have the prophet for things like this
also
we have the plasma gunship.
sorry for my outspoken opinion, but this is poor |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Connor McCloud
Admiral
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 916
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NO GOOD 
_________________
Greetz Connor 
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
al12
Admiral
Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Posts: 844
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| to powerfull. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Its not powerfull, is powerless... make it 0/100 and it would become usefull |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Noxus
Vice Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 493
Location: Michigan, USA
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wouldnt do any good anyways.. unless you knew someone who has a fleet of only 10 cyclops.. which would be unlikely to be by itself.. more than like cyclops are companied by cruisers..
anyways if you come up to a fleet of cruisers then you would be losing points... unless this ship attacked first against a fleet of only 10 cruisers..
10 cruisers= 600mp
1 of this ship= 1000mp
you'd be losing 400 points if the enemy had 11 ships instead, so this ship could only attack a certian type of fleet..
i would have to say no in short term..
_________________
-==Frag the Weak, Hurdle the Dead.==- |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
lilkrnboi1018
Admiral
Joined: 16 Apr 2005
Posts: 1182
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wen u think bout it, if u combine this with flamingo's then u have the god of ships... wait i have a question, does it have to fight itself or can enemy cruisers target the flamingo and it sitll activate?
nyways, NO GOOD
_________________
PWNAGE!
Gotta love the Magnum (RE 0-3)
Or the Eagle (RE 3)
Leader of DEFIANCE
The grounds are soaked... with your blood! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
mjx1
Admiral
Joined: 07 Mar 2004
Posts: 2258
Location: england
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i cant read the ship description can someone translate plz
_________________
"Although the constant shadow of certain death looms over everyday, the pleasures and joys of life can be so fine and deeply affecting that the heart is nearly stilled by astonishment" - Dean R Koontz |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
DavAlan
Admiral
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 778
Location: Palo Alto, California
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WTF is with the nanite multi-plasma ships??? This is the 4th one in the last week.
If you are nantite save yourself 384 mp, use 10 cruisers, 1 hammer and you will get the same result.
Unless you cant count over 9, then you may need this thing 
_________________
"Destruction leads to a very rough road
But it also breeds creation
And earthquakes are to a girl's guitar
They are just another good vibration
And tidal waves couldn't save the world
From Californication"
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Californication
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlUKcNNmywk
___________________________________
https://www.facebook.com/david.brass.524 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Connor McCloud
Admiral
Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 916
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu May 18, 2006 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mjx1 wrote: | | i cant read the ship description can someone translate plz |
It kills 20 C3 ships wich can't be repaired 
_________________
Greetz Connor
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 12:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dont pay attention to the description, quite powerfull like that.
If you take a o/100 with the syntax you can attack class 1, 2 , 3 and win alot of pts...this is a big plasma gun ship...But of course is useless |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Renee Davis
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 22 Jul 2005
Posts: 298
Location: Lautem, Timor Leste - Lautem District
|
| Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rubens wrote: | Dont pay attention to the description, quite powerfull like that.
If you take a o/100 with the syntax you can attack class 1, 2 , 3 and win alot of pts...this is a big plasma gun ship...But of course is useless |
IMHO someone must think nanite need a counter c3 for the plasma gunship and a way to render target c3 unreconstructable.
That person needs to try the above combination, or add other c3 that deal < or > than 100 ap (warcruisers, cluster cruisers, cloud cruisers, etc).
Besides, that is what c1 and c2 are for *DOH*.
Also that ship would have a very hard effect on a stack that uses single c1 and c2 blocks, or any costlly c3 (esp dreadnaughts: already being driven to extinction by plasma gunships). So ships like this would kill tactics and stacking and would simplify the gameplay by replacing entire fleet setups with a single ship (probably the concept that renders the dreadnaught questionable).
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
kamekaze6
Admiral
Joined: 12 Aug 2003
Posts: 1312
Location: Malta
|
| Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 8:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
3 things wrong with this, in order of imporatance:
1. its too dutch
2. its crap
3. its still too dutch  |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Noxus
Vice Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 493
Location: Michigan, USA
|
| Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
i dont like the picture.. too lame
now if he had a better picture with some cool things in the background, that be better
i still vote no on this 16-bit rendering of something i cant quite make out...
_________________
-==Frag the Weak, Hurdle the Dead.==- |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
_l.jpg)
