Recent topics Log in
Search Profile
Memberlist Usergroups
Log in to check your private messages
Register
leichter bomber
Post new topic   Reply to topic
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » New Technology Inventions » leichter bomber
View previous topic :: View next topic  

this vote will decide about the future of this invention:
this can be added to the game
33%
 33%  [ 3 ]
it needs some changes but it is a good invention
11%
 11%  [ 1 ]
i will post the needed changes here
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
no good try another one
55%
 55%  [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 9

Author Message
tec_server
Technology Bot
Technology Bot


Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 6:59 pm    Post subject: leichter bomber
Reply with quote
leichter bomber (class 1 ship)

starts a bombing raid on 1 destroyer and destroyed it T


attack/life: 0/1
manpower: 9

researchtime: 1 d
buildingtime: 12 h


human-technology
needed research:
gravity

battle details:
reduces LP to 0 of 1 destroyer in the enemy fleet in class 2 but some ships are immune against destruction
battlemessage: "o.k. ... ships"
(battle engine syntax: destroy,enemy,1,2,destroyer,o.k.)
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Rubens
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:00 pm    Post subject: Re: leichter bomber
Reply with quote
tec_server wrote:
leichter bomber (class 1 ship)

starts a bombing raid on 1 destroyer and destroyed it T


attack/life: 0/1
manpower: 9

researchtime: 1 d
buildingtime: 12 h


human-technology
needed research:
gravity

battle details:
reduces LP to 0 of 1 destroyer in the enemy fleet in class 2 but some ships are immune against destruction
battlemessage: "o.k. ... ships"
(battle engine syntax: destroy,enemy,1,2,destroyer,o.k.)


Doesnt sound that bad. We just need to adjust it to be similar than the apollo
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
O-siris
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 803
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 8:47 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
well yeah it doesn't sound bad i never said that but we don't need it
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rubens
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:08 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
I do.

If you are e-ray as example you cant make apollos...but you can do this.

My suggestion is amke the ship e-ray or kazuula so those ships can build the ship
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
O-siris
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 803
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:13 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
hmm never looked it from that way

e-ray doesn't have a good c2 attacker indeed
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Vrictus
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 01 Aug 2005
Posts: 662
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:39 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
what about eagle/campaign ship fleets.

or do you mean indirect c2 attackers

?
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Rubens
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
 Post Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 11:02 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
Obviously indirect.

If so nanite have troikas, MRB, apollos etc and all they works perfect...So i think this isnt such a bad ship
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
O-siris
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 803
 Post Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:04 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote
true true for e-ray this isn't a bad ship indeed
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rubens
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
 Post Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 1:50 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
E-rays and kazuulas.

Many questions.

1-Its possible to add this before the rounds begin?:/
2- If i am not alone when i say "i agree with this" why the poll is like that?
3- The ones who said not have a good explanation?
4- Who invented this or both ships?It would be good that he appears and tell us why he made up this for...
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kamekaze6
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Aug 2003
Posts: 1312
Location: Malta
 Post Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:48 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
I like this it could work but needs tobe tweaked. I think if the price was changed to say 6 and it had 2 lpitwould be good
_________________
STFU N00B!!!!111!1!

Click!!
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Jort
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 1264
Location: Amsterdam
 Post Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 5:57 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
mjx1 wrote:
who the hells inventing this ***


hmmmm i think a german does.
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
spacetrace
Board Admin
Board Admin


Joined: 24 Dec 2001
Posts: 1624
 Post Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:45 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
this one is good enough for a planet. the price seems ok to me, just the name has to be changed...

here is my suggestion for it:

tactical bomber
This heavy loaded fighter-class bomber carries a big load of explosives and is capable of destroying one class 2 ship. Beside the pilot, co-pilot, navigator and steward there are several aiming control officers needed.
( it has also no laundry robot )
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
O-siris
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 803
 Post Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:21 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
No laundry robot where do i have to wash my big underpants than

lol serious now:

thx admin
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rubens
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
 Post Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:51 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
spacetrace wrote:
this one is good enough for a planet. the price seems ok to me, just the name has to be changed...

here is my suggestion for it:

tactical bomber
This heavy loaded fighter-class bomber carries a big load of explosives and is capable of destroying one class 2 ship. Beside the pilot, co-pilot, navigator and steward there are several aiming control officers needed.
( it has also no laundry robot )


But that race?...So e-ray will forget about sabotage fighters...i mean why would be best to use Sab. fighters beside this? Make this kazuula!

You should change the syntax then...It says it just destroys a basic c2 ship, you are saying any c2 ship...

Why do we have to change the name? If we didnt invent this...i dont get that yet.

If so... "Uncovered destructor"
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
spacetrace
Board Admin
Board Admin


Joined: 24 Dec 2001
Posts: 1624
 Post Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:39 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
O-siris wrote:
No laundry robot where do i have to wash my big underpants than


just a running gag , check out the plasma gun ship
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
O-siris
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 803
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 9:27 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote
yes i know
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mast3r w1nn3r
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant


Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 30
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 6:05 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote
i like it good enough for class one not too good not too bad
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
mast3r w1nn3r
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant


Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 30
 Post Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 6:05 pm    Post subject:
i like it good enough for class one not too good not too bad
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » New Technology Inventions » leichter bomber
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Solaris phpBB theme/template by Jakob Persson
Copyright © Jakob Persson 2003


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Impressum