View previous topic :: View next topic |
this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
this can be added to the game |
|
14% |
[ 1 ] |
it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
no good try another one |
|
85% |
[ 6 ] |
|
Total Votes : 7 |
|
Author |
Message |
tec_server Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:48 pm Post subject: race probe |
|
|
race probe
the race probe is half-invetigation probe. it has a lower scan radius but it also views the race and evo of the player, this way you know who to pick your fights with. because of more hardware it is heavier thus slower.
scanradius: 5
speed: warp 5
researchtime: 1 d
buildingtime: 5 h
nanite-technology
needed research:
gravobionics |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Tough Guy 1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 236 Location: the netherlands, europe
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Invented by me, its not a artwork but i think its still pretty good. _________________ Take your weapons soldiers! We march to battle! We march to glory! We march to the enemy! And we march to death! Fight well, and you shall forever be remembered as strong and brave! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
lilkrnboi1018 Admiral
Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 1182 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eh nice try, but i think u really don't need dat, and it would require too much extra programming _________________ PWNAGE!
Gotta love the Magnum (RE 0-3)
Or the Eagle (RE 3)
Leader of DEFIANCE
The grounds are soaked... with your blood! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Tough Guy 1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 236 Location: the netherlands, europe
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The idea is good but its not useul enough to implement, its kinda hard thinking of new stuff. I agree. _________________ Take your weapons soldiers! We march to battle! We march to glory! We march to the enemy! And we march to death! Fight well, and you shall forever be remembered as strong and brave! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
WilliamWallace Admiral
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 893
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LMAO
1 it doesn't have a syntax
2 you can look at what race somebody is by clicking on the players name, then you get a message screen and at the top his name and race appear
3 knowing someone's evo isn't helpfull. looking at his battle history thus trying to find out what his tactics are and deep-scanning him is more usefull. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Tough Guy 1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 236 Location: the netherlands, europe
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1. there was no syntax option.
2. I forgot about that.
3. that can be debated.
I am still kinda new. And do you have to mock me in everything i do? Shut up, its a waste of time, its not like im offended. _________________ Take your weapons soldiers! We march to battle! We march to glory! We march to the enemy! And we march to death! Fight well, and you shall forever be remembered as strong and brave! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
WilliamWallace Admiral
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 893
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't want to mock on you.
I can give help, I'd like to help let you become a better player. And about the inventing:
1 There is. I can show you, I can give you a guide by pm. There really is, and otherwise you can post one later on in this thread based on what you can learn of the syntaxes in the manual
2 can happen to all, np.
3 yes that can
But please, try to accomplish this:
behave a BIT on this forum, so stop unnessesary flaming/insulting |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Vrictus Admiral
Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Posts: 662
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
interesting idea, but knowing the past battles of a foe would be useful, just as william said.
i like the idea.
how about a more detail DSP, gives you infomation of one players fleets...what he is using etc...
but that might b a bit unbalanced...
inventing isnt my strongpoint lol
rubens might have a stronger opinion... |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
WilliamWallace Admiral
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 893
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vrictus wrote: | interesting idea, but knowing the past battles of a foe would be useful, just as william said.
i like the idea.
how about a more detail DSP, gives you infomation of one players fleets...what he is using etc...
but that might b a bit unbalanced...
inventing isnt my strongpoint lol
rubens might have a stronger opinion... |
Rubens will have a strong opinion as usual, he will think it is too strong and makes it too easy for all players to own space. He likes to keep that job to the pros
When being neutral I'd react on the above:
When showing my own attitude I'd react:
Just letting you know. Helping newbies is ok, but this simply seems too strong. Just my opinion |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
lilkrnboi1018 Admiral
Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 1182 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well giving evo's won't help som1 too much, it'll show they're vulnerable if it's low, but it won't tell if they had 4 veterans watchin their back or not, so it is kinda useless
although i encourage u to keep tryin tough guy _________________ PWNAGE!
Gotta love the Magnum (RE 0-3)
Or the Eagle (RE 3)
Leader of DEFIANCE
The grounds are soaked... with your blood! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Connor McCloud Admiral
Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 916 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No good , try another one
reason it has no use to know someones EVO . it will only make it easier to pick out the NooBs to attack them . if you have a high Evo you won't be under attack because you could have lots of nice ships that scares the ones looking for easy scoring .
So it has only use to people that don't really understand the game and want to make big scores by hitting less evo players (NooBs) only
Greetz Connor _________________ Greetz Connor
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Ratchet 2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Posts: 178 Location: @ home
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
WilliamWallace wrote: | I don't want to mock on you.
I can give help, I'd like to help let you become a better player. And about the inventing:
1 There is. I can show you, I can give you a guide by pm. There really is, and otherwise you can post one later on in this thread based on what you can learn of the syntaxes in the manual
2 can happen to all, np.
3 yes that can
But please, try to accomplish this:
behave a BIT on this forum, so stop unnessesary flaming/insulting |
off topic william what's with the numbers just asking _________________
Last edited by Ratchet on Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:27 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Tough Guy 1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 236 Location: the netherlands, europe
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
your scientists can start fundamental research in this section.
please give a detailed description what they search for.
~ only a balanced theory can lead to a new invention ~
research name:
detailed description:
this should be a description how the ship achieves its effects.
(it should not only contain the translation of the modifyer)
researchtime:
needed research: choose --------- improved cloaking technology fanatic warfare improved computer technology advanced tactics leadership improved field theories gravity holo technology gravobionics final exploration emp technology nano technology improved targeting science recycle methods mobile TWG dark tactics clone labs shipyard other
research type: building or ship probe basic research
scanradius:
probespeed:
races: e-rays mycilloids humans kazuuula nanites
class
warp (if class 4) can provide warp only for itself
cloaking
battle-commands:
when the ship starts action in a battle it will work through this modifier:
construct
see
examples f
AP/LP: /
manpower:
buildingtime:
picture:
if you have a picture insert the best quality here, we will resize it
see? where can I put the syntax? This the wrong one. But theres no syntax in the probe. and ratchet spammed you know. he only did qoute. _________________ Take your weapons soldiers! We march to battle! We march to glory! We march to the enemy! And we march to death! Fight well, and you shall forever be remembered as strong and brave! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
WilliamWallace Admiral
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 893
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well maybe this quote is also enough.
syntax = modifier for battle-commands
Tough Guy wrote: |
battle-commands:
when the ship starts action in a battle it will work through this modifier:
construct
see
examples f |
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
mdellis 1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 12 Mar 2004 Posts: 296 Location: Aldershot, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At least people are now able to put forward (at least partly) sensible inventions, unlike the last time I played ST when it seemed like every other day some n00b was trying to create a doomstar rip-off with 1mp and 1hr build time THAT got frustrating. There doesn't seem to be that kind of shit any more, which is good. _________________ Cleanse, Purge, Kill! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Vrictus Admiral
Joined: 01 Aug 2005 Posts: 662
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nice to see you again mdellis...
if you remember me that is... |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Jort Admiral
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 1264 Location: Amsterdam
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i was in an alliance with him for a VERY short time |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
lilkrnboi1018 Admiral
Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 1182 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
who is he?
and i think this topic should be closed _________________ PWNAGE!
Gotta love the Magnum (RE 0-3)
Or the Eagle (RE 3)
Leader of DEFIANCE
The grounds are soaked... with your blood! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Star Commander Admiral
Joined: 26 Sep 2004 Posts: 1734 Location: Bolton
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
MDellis is a very old player, he played in APEmpire to i think. _________________ APEmpire |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Posts: 1422
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, this topic shouldnt be closed till the autor(who recognized his invention) understands why is his ship good or bad.
I can close this or take it to the imposible inventions easily.
1-Nanite technology? It should be for everyone(Just preventing that someone add somethings. You just choose all the races, so it ould be done
2-Gravobionic as a needed research? Once and again the probe hasnt a relation to that research
3-Research time:1 day...When have u seen a probe that takes more than 1 day to be researched? and even more useless if you compare this as a standard investgation probe
4-It takes 5 hours: Less scanradius, less speed, and more time to be builded?
5-As many players said before. you are just getting an extra feature, the evolution of the enemy. a)If you are doing this just like an investigation probe you will have to re-send this to the planets already scanned to see their evolutions. B)Why would you see the enemy's evoluton?As the admin said, there is no difference between a good fleet structured of standard ships and other fleet with others ships. Even so, there is no point to see his evolution, because a player can change his fleet or use standard ships anyway.C)As you can see the only good thing is that you could see when a enemy(that surely would have to be near) has reached the 100% and the apostate comes to his planet.
6-As you undesrstood the "raze" or "race" is not a feature of this probe.
Extra-things about it, this, you, and he...LOL
Though guy, if you read one of your posts you sa
id you are still a noob. So, why would you waste credits making this probe if you are not sure that it would work for our community and that it would match with the game?.There are wormholes waiting for your credits
@Vrictus, certainly it would be unbalanced and too powerfull. And a DSP that gives you information of past battles would be uselss.
Greetings. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
|