Multi?

[WilliamWallace]

Ok. I ran into this bastard. Look at this fool bastard! : Red-Bull24 of Mordorr


I was skimming some possible multies and saw this:

Here are the BR's


23.05 03:47

attack by 575 ships
class 1:
500 fighters (1/1, 1 MP)
class 2:
40 destroyers (10/10, 8 MP) <==========================

Ok, this is a fleet with round numbers and like easy fleet. So or a multi farm or a n00b. No proof YET

class 3:
33 cruisers (100/100, 60 MP

class 4:
2 motherships (0/1000, 320 MP)
buildings:
1 transwarp-network (0/100, 0 MP)
1 research center (0/3500, 0 MP)
1 shipyard (0/3500, 0 MP)

destroyed:

class 1:
500 fighters
class 2:
40 destroyers
class 3:
33 cruisers

score: 1891

attack by 298 ships
class 1:
251 penguins (4/1, 1 MP) <==========================
A decent fleet, nice and balanced. Against fleets like these ( Didnt copy them all ) he always loses points against this fleets

class 2:
12 destroyers (10/10, 8 MP)
16 shield generators (0/2, 4 MP)
4 wasps (1/10, 11 MP)
class 3:
2 cruisers (100/100, 60 MP)
3 cyclopses (0/100, 120 MP)
9 plasma gunship (0/100, 92 MP)
class 4:
1 mothership (0/1000, 320 MP)


destroyed:

-

score: -320

attack by 2200 ships
class 1:
66 fighters (1/1, 1 MP) <======================
Same as last time. To difficult for him

8 emp-fighters (0/1, 1 MP)
49 interceptors (0/1, 1 MP)
273 sabotage fighters (0/1, 1 MP)
2 sporators (0/1, 5 MP)
1801 penguins (4/1, 1 MP)
class 4:
1 mothership (0/1000, 320 MP)


destroyed:

class 1:
1801 penguins
35 sabotage fighters
7 fighters
8 interceptors
1 emp-fighter

score: -1240


20.05 20:48
attack by 3 ships
class 1:
1 fighter (1/1, 1 MP) <==========================
An attack on an open base. Nothing strange


class 2:
1 destroyer (10/10, 8 MP)
class 3:
1 cruiser (100/100, 60 MP)
class 4:
buildings:
1 transwarp-network (0/100, 0 MP)
1 research center (0/3500, 0 MP)
1 shipyard (0/3500, 0 MP)


destroyed:

class 1:
1 fighter
class 2:
1 destroyer
class 3:
1 cruiser

score: 9



18.05 14:17
attack by 3 ships
class 3:
2 cruisers (100/100, 60 MP)
class 4:
1 mothership (0/1000, 320 MP)


destroyed:

-

score: 0


18.05 14:17
attack by 31 ships
class 3:
30 cyclopses (0/100, 120 MP) <=======================
Here is a not smart multi fleet.
Everybody sees this is shit that is easily
beaten. First big proof, cause what I said
about round numbers is arguable


class 4:
1 mothership (0/1000, 320 MP)

Destroyed:

class 3:
30 cyclopses

score: 3600

18.05 14:17
attack by 1 ship
class 4:
1 mothership (0/1000, 320 MP) <=======================
A few motherships. Doesnt have to
be multing


destroyed:

class 4:
1 mothership

score: 320

class 4:
1 mothership

score: 320

17.05 13:57
attack by 33 ships <==========================
Again the Cyclopses!


class 3:
32 cyclopses (0/100, 120 MP)
class 4:
1 mothership (0/1000, 320 MP)


destroyed:

class 3:
2 cyclopses

score: -680

17.05 03:51
attack by 131 ships
class 1:
100 fighters (1/1, 1 MP) <==========================
And this is AGAIN such a multing fleet with
easy round numbers, like he designed it and
then build a fleet with anti-ships that always
destroy round numbers of other ships.
Example: 10 cruisers is 10 plasma gunners
needed. 20 destroyers is 2 appolos needed. 100
fighters is 1 cyclops needed. With a bit of mp, u
score 860

class 2:


20 destroyers (10/10, 8 MP)
class 3:
10 cruisers (100/100, 60 MP)
class 4:
1 mothership (0/1000, 320 MP)


destroyed:

class 1:
100 fighters
class 2:
20 destroyers
class 3:
10 cruisers

score: 860

[DarthMother]

Please William, what the heck are you trying to prove. He loses and he wins so what. This isn't long enough evidence of being a multi. What are you trying to do, frame other people again to cover up your own failures in the past (en those going on right now)???

[WilliamWallace]

Hey, I just posted some stuf. There is much more!


And are u blind? This looks like very nasty multi shit to me

[WilliamWallace]

And I am posting it here. Because I think he is multi. But I dont feel like reporting him right away. First just do this and see if others think he is multing too

[DarthMother]

1. this can be pure coincedence, i love taking out C3's too, the best with c1 or c2, that gives nice points.
2. you playing fair?? ROFL bashing like hell and that's fair?? i still owe you some nice fleets just as i owe lance a couple of them.
3. THis is just another low-life action, just as you did with base back then. if you even SUSPECT them of being a multi, report them then in stead of discredit them first in forum. If you are a so respectable good player as you say you are, then you won't do this kind of shit. As if you don't have br's where i can doubt, you had them before. If i see one of them, i just report them. If they are innocent, too bad then, i have done my job to look into it, nothing more. I don't put everything i suspect in forum. Looking for enemies again boy??

PS: i don't stick any more time in this sh*t, this is just too sick for words

[kamekaz6]

thats not a multy farm to me, just a newb. i see nothing wrong here

[WilliamWallace]

F.Uck off DM.

1 U are allready my enemie. If u want it or not.

2 And posting in forum first is even better then immediatly reporting them. And the thing back then with Base. U should shut up your f.cukface. Cause u dont even knwo what was going on between us. That has got nothing to do with it. Neither has my multi past.

3 By the way, do u hear me always whyning about your old multi past? No, cause I dont act that low.

4 And idd, it can be a coincedence. But u never know. So thats why I posted it in General Discussion. So that people can talk about it. And this aint a topic for some idiots talking about the past.

[WilliamWallace]

Come on Kame. I have fought against MUCH people. But I dont believe there are that much newbs out there and they all build the same shit: 100 fighters, 50 destroyers, 15 cruisers.

If u constantly run into that kinda shit, u dont believe it anymore. It just happens to often. And it sure aint clean if he is attacked like everyday after the other day, constantly by that same fleet.

And once in a whyle, there also comes something like 30 cyclopses flying to your base for fun. If u have come that far to think u have to research things and u researched cyclops cause u need it, u surely would have understood the fact that they arent balanced on their own. And that it isnt smart to send in a major c2 or c3 fleet

[kamekaz6]

actually eldar, i find it easier to bit odd numbered fleets and more difficult to beat round numbered fleets when i m using cyclopses apollos and plasma gunships!!

[lowvoice]

I knew he was a multi all along he attacked me once and i beat him hehehehehe

[Kirby]

He doesn't have to be a multi, some newbies do stuff like this you don't have to do things like this Elder Priest of Hammerfall A.K.A William Wallace AkA Brutus.

As DM said, you just wanne make you're stupid mistakes look less stupid. But you know, this is a stupid mistake
_________________
It's a bird, it's a plane......NO!!! It's KIRBY!!

[Star Commander]

elder i think you should just report it ingame and i think the 30 odd cyclops wereLOWVOICEs as i was gonna attack 30 class 3 at his planet so i dont think he is a multi.


Lowvoice thought they did more then destory class 1 lol
_________________
APEmpire

[lowvoice]

reporting multis ingame cost credits thats stupid

[kamekaze6]

it s better than if it gives u credits
otherwise every one in st would be accused what a nightmare for the admins
_________________
STFU N00B!!!!111!1!

Click!!

[WilliamWallace]

Yeah, well Starcommander, I dont care about the credits.

But I wasnt sure, so I posted it here to ask others opinions. Opinions from people like Kame, Starcommander, Lowvoice and so on.

Not from DM or Kirbs, cause the only thing they do is complaining and saying shit about others.

In the end, it looks like he doesnt have to be a multi, but it is suspicious

[Kirby]

If you post shit like this you will get my opinion and my opinion is: Fuck off and let that guy play
_________________
It's a bird, it's a plane......NO!!! It's KIRBY!!

[mjx1]

I personnally think that the rules need too be updated ie no hacking follow the rules of irc and forum and stuff like that what do you think admin?

[mjx1]

upps sorry everyone i meant too click new topic then

[Connor McCloud]

I don't think he is a multy , if you look into his BR you see he also loses battles so if he was multying he would score far higher than he is now doing
_________________
Greetz Connor