 |
View previous topic :: View next topic |
this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
this can be added to the game |
|
16% |
[ 1 ] |
it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
16% |
[ 1 ] |
i will post the needed changes here |
|
16% |
[ 1 ] |
no good try another one |
|
50% |
[ 3 ] |
|
Total Votes : 6 |
|
Author |
Message |
tec_server Technology Bot

Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
atomic death star 1 (class 4 ship)
this is like the death star from star wars episode 4 but it cannot destroy the planet, only the defensive array can be destroyed bt this ship. it is class 4 so it can leave alone, as a premature attack. it can provide the warp field for itself.
attack/life: 1/10
manpower: 3384
speed: warp 10
(can only establish a warpfield for itself)
this ship has a cloaking device
researchtime: 3 d 12 h
buildingtime: 2 d
needed research:
improved field theories
|
|
Back to top » |
|
 |
5th special forces Captain

Joined: 20 Sep 2004 Posts: 141
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
this sounds ok but it has beaucoup mp. if it could use a little less, like maybe 200 less than what it has it could be used by almost everyone. |
|
Back to top » |
|
 |
DavAlan Admiral

Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 778 Location: Palo Alto, California
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2004 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another doom-star ...lol...well you sure will not need skill for this game with 5 different doom stars availible to build...
 |
|
Back to top » |
|
 |
Achilles 1st Rear Admiral


Joined: 22 May 2003 Posts: 334 Location: Wisconsin-USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2004 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is nothing like a doomstar.
I do like the idea of an "array-killer" ship, but the stats are all wrong here.
It shouldnt have its own warp, it should not be in class four, and the mp is way to high.
Maybe something like a sabotage fighter would be cool, that only affects the defensive array. Like: class two, 0/10, does five damage to def array and self destructs. Maybe 8 mp or so.
This would be a pretty good ship as far as Im concerned. A good function but difficult to use.
And change the name to G-98 "Hunter" Bomber or something like that. |
|
Back to top » |
|
 |
JaM Admiral

Joined: 23 Mar 2003 Posts: 1300
|
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
You can do the same with a fleet tender and a mantis, and a lot cheaper and somehow more effective because it also destroys TWG and other ships in class 4
|
|
Back to top » |
|
 |
darkwolf Captain

Joined: 13 Dec 2003 Posts: 114 Location: Venezuela
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
if this ship is meant to destroy the defensive array, then we should be able of reconstruct the DA once is destroyed.
and that is not the point of the DA, so the ship is out of place
_________________ 50 characters are not enough to tell the world... what i have to say |
|
Back to top » |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
|