Recent topics Log in
Search Profile
Memberlist Usergroups
Log in to check your private messages
Register
quarter carrier
Post new topic   Reply to topic
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » New Technology Inventions » quarter carrier
View previous topic :: View next topic  

this vote will decide about the future of this invention:
this can be added to the game
20%
 20%  [ 1 ]
it needs some changes but it is a good invention
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
i will post the needed changes here
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
no good try another one
80%
 80%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 5

Author Message
tec_server
Technology Bot
Technology Bot


Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746

 Post Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 6:57 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

quarter carrier (class 4 ship)

this is a carrier that retains half of the class 1 until the end of the battle, leaving the other half to fight. those ships that survived the battle will be left behind, therego will self-destructs.
this ship will act, before the class 1 battle begins. (i am not sure about how the battle syntax should be)


attack/life: 0/100
manpower: 600

researchtime: 2 d
buildingtime: 12 h


nanite-technology
needed research:
nano technology
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Weylyn
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 19 Jan 2004
Posts: 691
Location: The Netherlands

 Post Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 9:44 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

And what would be the use of this? You just halve your firepower.

_________________
Join the army, meet interesting people, kill them.
WoC-leader
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
1st Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany

 Post Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 10:11 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

the next stupid invetion! it's getting boring!


Greets
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Weylyn
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 19 Jan 2004
Posts: 691
Location: The Netherlands

 Post Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 1:33 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Indeed. Outgoing message to all spammers: BE CREATIVE!

_________________
Join the army, meet interesting people, kill them.
WoC-leader
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Liderant
1st Rear Admiral
1st Rear Admiral


Joined: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 273
Location: Venezuela

 Post Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 3:48 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Well, now i must consider myself a spammer, just because i created a ship. But why dont you guys consider yourself spammers if you keep always saying the same? You have to open your minds a little. I am sure you didnt think in what situation this ship will be usefull, but just started to write "SPAMMER".
Consider you are under attack by several fleets with many class 1 ships. This ship will stop all class 1, without compromising your higher classes. In that way it is to powerfull, and that's why i though it must selfdestructs half of the survival ships, so that when you fight against only a fighter, you will lose some points.
Maybe half of the ships is to much
so what do you think spammers of the spammers?
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
LaddyApple
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Posts: 66

 Post Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 4:23 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Ship wont do nothing but die anyway, no battle syntax.

_________________
Many fleets will come,
Many fleets will fall,
But at the end,
The true warrior will prevail.
Leader of Warriors of Chaos
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
kamekaze6
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Aug 2003
Posts: 1312
Location: Malta

 Post Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 7:15 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

i think this might work in some cases like defense
with 10 fighters you can withstand 2 attacksif this ship doesn t sd the class 1 it can keep defending until there is just 1 ship left. it might be a bit powerful but at 600 mp i think it s resonable

_________________
STFU N00B!!!!111!1!

Click!!
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Lord Lou
Commander
Commander


Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 76

 Post Posted: Sun May 30, 2004 7:24 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

n00bs don't spam. This is good invention.

but,
1. make it half all classes (1,2 & 3)
2. less mp.
I could be very usefel in defence when you have like 2/2/2/x
you could withstand 2 attacks
(this way only if second fleet is pengins or kamis (or any class 1 ship)

_________________
Protector of Weak, and Defender of Small.
...and I will strike down with great vengance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brotherin, and u will now my name is the Lord, when I lay my vengance upon you!
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Weylyn
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 19 Jan 2004
Posts: 691
Location: The Netherlands

 Post Posted: Mon May 31, 2004 2:11 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Hmm, I hate to admit it but you do have a point Lou.

_________________
Join the army, meet interesting people, kill them.
WoC-leader
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
doomstar
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 06 May 2004
Posts: 408

 Post Posted: Mon May 31, 2004 9:50 pm    Post subject:

What about using [retreat fighter] and [evasor]. Similar in idea, but less mp. I think the ship has potential for class 3, but the idea for class 1 and class 2 has already been cover by the previously mentioned ships.

 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » New Technology Inventions » quarter carrier
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Solaris phpBB theme/template by Jakob Persson
Copyright © Jakob Persson 2003



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Impressum