Recent topics Log in
Search Profile
Memberlist Usergroups
Log in to check your private messages
Register
infinitesimal saber destroyer
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » New Technology Inventions » infinitesimal saber destroyer
View previous topic :: View next topic  

this vote will decide about the future of this invention:
this can be added to the game
57%
 57%  [ 31 ]
it needs some changes but it is a good invention
3%
 3%  [ 2 ]
i will post the needed changes here
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
no good try another one
37%
 37%  [ 20 ]
Total Votes : 54

Author Message
tec_server
Technology Bot
Technology Bot


Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746

 Post Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 2:28 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

infinitesimal saber destroyer (class 1 ship)

this ship is a fighter that has the same attack point of a destroyer and does 1 damage to a class 2 ship when it self-destructs.


attack/life: 10/1
manpower: 6

researchtime: 2 d
buildingtime: 14 h


nanite-technology

battle details:fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
modifies AP/LP by 0/-1 of 2 ships of any ship-type in the enemy fleet in the same class
(battle engine syntax: mod,enemy,2,this,all,+,0,-1)
self destructs!
battlemessage: "infinitesimal overheats and is destroyed ... ships"
(battle engine syntax: sd,infinitesimal overheats and is destroyed)
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 2:29 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

don't worry. Infinitesimal is a real word =) I thought it would make it sound more sophisticated
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
JaM
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300

 Post Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 8:27 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Quote:
battlemessage: "infinitesimal overheats and is destroyed ... ships"

Shouldn't the battlemessage be: and destroyed ... ships
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 3:05 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

no. This is the messages when itself get destroyed. Why is this an impossible inventiong?!?!?!
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Nuclearmin
Captain
Captain


Joined: 25 Oct 2002
Posts: 132
Location: Germany

 Post Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 11:07 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Quote "battlemessage: "infinitesimal overheats and is destroyed ... ships"" <----- because of that. ships.
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address ICQ Number
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 4:58 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

oh whoops =) It can be changed =) But y is this invention impossible?
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
BladeTech
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 1591

 Post Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 9:14 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

so it self-destructs and does 1 damage to a c2 ship?
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 9:38 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

yeah. Correction on your part- it does 1 damage on "2" c2 ships
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
noah
1st Rear Admiral
1st Rear Admiral


Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 271
Location: USA

 Post Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 9:55 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

thats not what the battle syntax says.
it says it (fights) then

Quote:
modifies AP/LP by 0/-1 of 2 ships of any ship-type in the enemy fleet in the same class


that means it modifies two more class 1 ships by 0/-1 so in essence it kills three class 1 ships.


_________________
All your base are belong to us...
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 9:57 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

oppps...its supposed to be "that" instead of "this" I wonder how that happened. Well things like that can be fixed.
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
darklim
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela

 Post Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 10:43 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

TOO POWERFULL!!!!!

_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2003 4:19 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

wat do you mean too powerful? I balanced it all out! look, if it was to fight against a class one fleet you will totally lose. think about it. even though the ap of this ship is 10, it will only destroy 1 fighter and self destruct. You lose 6 and he lose 1. This ship is only successful against higher classes. You would use this ship as a second wavve, after you have demolished their class1. Not only that, but once it engages the class2 it will be evenly matched except, this ship selfdestructs. Also, this ship is very vunerable to eagles and troikas. The good thing is, if you end up fighting a destoyer fleet your in luck =) Now stop blabbing "TOO POWERFUL!" at my inventions =
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
darklim
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela

 Post Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2003 11:14 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Why you need a class 1 with power of class 2?
And this is useless.


_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2003 1:36 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

no it isn't. It is very useful if you end up having a class1 vs. class2 fight.
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
admin
Board Admin
Board Admin


Joined: 09 Jan 2002
Posts: 2938

 Post Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 8:38 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

we moved it into impossible, because there are already some sips like that: kamikaze, peguin...


and the
Quote:
battlemessage: "infinitesimal overheats and is destroyed ... ships"
(battle engine syntax: sd,infinitesimal overheats and is destroyed)


is a bug in the generation of the words, so we will fix that some day
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
1st Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany

 Post Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2003 9:23 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

i think we don't need this invention!



Greetings
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2003 1:00 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

why do you say you don't need it. See from my perspective this ship is unlike any ship that currently exists. Unlike the prophet and kamikaze, this ship intergrates another ship's ability without creating a unreasonable ap. See, the kamikaze does 35 damage. Where would you get that kind of number. and the penguin only fights and recycles. This ship not only fights fairly with a different class, but it selfdestructs and it deals damage when it does. I don't think there is one ship like this, but this ship is more like a combination with a twist =)
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
blackmagic
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP

 Post Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:16 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

hello? anybody gonna respond?
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
darklim
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela

 Post Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2003 7:55 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Let me help you to understand why this ship is useless.
This ship self destruct, right?
And only have 1 LP, i'm right?
Ok, let see this battle report (Is fake)
1 Infinitecimal Saber Destroyer
Vs
1 fighter

Now, losses
Your losses
1 Infinitecimal Saber Destroyer (10/1 mp: 6)

Enemy losses
1 fighter (1/1 mp: 1)

Score: -5

Only fighting class 2 is useful, but no 1 fleet don't have class 1.

_________________
One planet is habited by E-rays, Human, Kazuula, Nanite, Mycilloid. These race is ruled by the Evil Dark Lord. Named Dark Lim who hate cheat, and make the race to fight, called hi empire Dark Caracas. Dark Lim of Dark Caracas will fight multi.

[ This Message was edited by: darklim on 2003-07-08 20:55 ]
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
BladeTech
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 1591

 Post Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2003 3:42 am    Post subject:

that isn't how it is suppposed to be used then
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » New Technology Inventions » infinitesimal saber destroyer
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Solaris phpBB theme/template by Jakob Persson
Copyright © Jakob Persson 2003



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Impressum