| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
83% |
[ 5 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
16% |
[ 1 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 6 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
nanominiaturization (basic research)
this tech enables more powerful ships with smaller processors and the ships itself become more compact, but, because of its power in such small size ships, they overheat easily, exploding at the end of a battle.
researchtime: 4 d
 nanite-technology
needed research:
nano technology
battle details:
battle engine syntax:
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
blackmagic
Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Not quite sure about this, but i've been thinking of this tech for several months now. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I think we need a "for example" for this tech. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
blackmagic
Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i do. The infinitesimal sabe destroyers =) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
JaM
Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Only the names. Can't they be shorter?
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Humm
What kind of ship have with this tecnology?
Like the Nano Bomber but more stronger?
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok the example you gave the infinitesimal saber destroyer
attack/life: 10/1
manpower: 6
researchtime: 2 d
buildingtime: 14 h
This is already rather powerful for a class one ship. I know you added self destruction, but, considering it also can destroy another two fighters, I think it is just too strong for a class one ship. This is of course debateable, but remains my opinion.
So, if your new research is headed towards making ships, that would otherwise be impossible, I think its probably not going to be admitted. But I am not saying the research is unbalanced in itself.
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
blackmagic
Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 4:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ahhh, thats where your wrong. if you read carefully it said it does 1 damage to 2 class2 ships. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Dracofire
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 06 Jun 2003
Posts: 22
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think with a smaller proccesser it could have a bigger cooling system so it wouldnt explode
_________________
never look behind you.
Always look behind you if you a crazed maniac is after you though.
gotta run!!! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
blackmagic
Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| nope. Having a biggger cooling system will cost more and the point of this tech is to have a faster and effecient ship without any extra weight =) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2003 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let see this:
I don't known the NAME 
Class 1
0/1
MP:3
Do 1 damage to three class 1.
After the battle self destruct.
This ship is deployed by:
I don't known the NAME 
0/15
MP:23
Deploys 10 class 1 (i don't known the NAME)
Please post idea for names. 
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
blackmagic
Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2003 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
wat the heck was that? Are those your ideas or existing ships? The last one sounds like the cluster-cruiser. Well if you want names i can give names=) im good at crazy names =) Uhh......
1) the differect cluster-cruiser
2) I have no idea
3) Should this be in it's own topic?
4) Ok...the name.....if it was like a nanite then i would say something like "Ba'leath nanodeployer" or..... Ah i can't think of anything = |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
