 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
40% |
[ 6 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
13% |
[ 2 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
46% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 15 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
fighter inverted (class 1 ship)
this heavy armored fighter is an upgrade to the basic rudimentary fighters
attack/life: 1/2
manpower: 1
researchtime: 1 d
buildingtime: 11 h
 nanite-technology
needed research:
advanced tactics
battle details:fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
battle engine syntax: trigger_0_plus@
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Lord Philemon
Vice Admiral
Joined: 12 Mar 2002
Posts: 556
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
If it has more lifepoints than a normal fighter, it also should have more manpower, otherwise it would be too good.
Btw: We already have almost the ship you suggested:
The mosquito... |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Nuclearmin
Captain
Joined: 25 Oct 2002
Posts: 132
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What is with blockade runner? Not good enough? 1/2 cant be worth one mp.
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
KYr Shantor
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 22 Jan 2003
Posts: 19
Location: Venezuela
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2003 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i agree with nuclear .... the blockade runner is allready 1/2 and cost a reasonable 2 mp 
_________________
Kyr shantor
".....In war the victorious strategist only seeks battle ....
after the victory has been won." |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
|
