score not drop below zero

[admin]

please vote again here only about this change

discussion see here:
http://www.spacetrace.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4823

[T2]

Decision deferred for a few days until results of other questions are decided.
It may not be required at this time.

[Failtrip1]

It will be abused.
_________________
http://toptenproxysites.com/
http://www.chooseyourproxy.com/

[Jack09]

Ive already started why.
_________________
11/11/11

[Inatic]

abuse

[MicroJak]

If you invited all of the newbies who play spacetrace to decide on a poll option, the result would be 90% Yes, 10% No
_________________

[Connor McCloud]

Not needed will be abused .
with all these changing it will be become a less tactical/skilled game
_________________
Greetz Connor

[Jack09]

How come the game was so bad before?

And why didnt all this get brought up before when the games was started years ago, all of it started i would say in the last few weeks or so with the CGC/XYZ war.
_________________
11/11/11

[Senor]

i voted yes on this change. negative personal score has no purpose, it just makes a person feel bad. having 0 the minimum gives newbies a "wall" to lean their backs against.
alliance scores should be able to go into negative though.

but about all other changes...lets not rush into anything. one change at a time.

[SpaceGamer]

Somebody please explain more to me about how this can be abused? Several people say it will be but I don't get how?

If you win a battle you get points. If you loose a battle you loose points until you get to zero how is that going to be abused?

[Mighty]

it will be abused by multies.... one account goes up while other not going down..
_________________

AKA "Ace" (21 Apr 2008)
AKA "God" (29 Sep 2002)
AKA "SMod" (25 oct 2002)
Permanently inactive since - 20 Mar 2009

[SpaceGamer]

Mighty are you saying you are back and running multiple accounts?

[dumenop]

it allows people to suicide without caring what the result is.
_________________
But why male models?

[Mighty]

just answering your question my little multi
_________________

AKA "Ace" (21 Apr 2008)
AKA "God" (29 Sep 2002)
AKA "SMod" (25 oct 2002)
Permanently inactive since - 20 Mar 2009

[zaphod]

i am against it, but as i said. i think it could be good to be protected getting negativ as long as you are in a noob ally. when u leave it, you can be nagative. (feeling the hard ST life)

[T2]

When farmers "farm" there is a sacrificial account made specifically to lose points. This addition should not encourage farming as going into minus never DISCOURAGED them before.
So... I think that going below zero is a good boost for new players ego's.

Alliances should however show a negative score if it applies. It will be impossible to guage how good a new player is if an alliance is thinking about recruiting him/her but that don't matter.

I think the good out weighs the bad in this case.

[Santa of the darkness]

I have voted for keeping the lowest score to zero. However I also agree with senor that changing the scoring points would be a bad idea. With every game it’s about having fun and enjoying the game and this applies to new starters and the more experienced players.

You have to keep a balance to encourage more players to join but at the same time keeping the loyal players of the game interested too

[MicroJak]

[mjx1]

MJ Mightys an expert multy I think he knows how it works
_________________
"Although the constant shadow of certain death looms over everyday, the pleasures and joys of life can be so fine and deeply affecting that the heart is nearly stilled by astonishment" - Dean R Koontz

[admin]

so there are no crucial cons.

we will apply this change now

no players and no alliance can drop below zero.

(and we will keep the theoretical negative score stats for multihunting)