| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
11% |
[ 4 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
8% |
[ 3 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
60% |
[ 21 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
20% |
[ 7 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 35 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
energy cruiser
this cruiser only has limited
energy recources, so it
weakens after every fight.
attack/life: 100/100
manpower: 100
researchtime: 1 d
buildingtime: 10 h
 nanite-technology
needed research:
gravity
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
admin
Board Admin
Joined: 09 Jan 2002
Posts: 2938
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 2:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
energy cruiser (class 3 ship)
this cruiser is an evolved energy cruiser. (no research etc.)
attack/life: 50/50
manpower: 100
researchtime: -
buildingtime: -
battle details:
fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
self destructs!
(battle engine syntax: sd)
[ This Message was edited by: admin on 2002-11-04 02:31 ] |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2003 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
USELESS!!!
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Nemesis
Vice Admiral
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
Posts: 452
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2003 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah, you might as well use a normal cruiser, it's cheaperand doesn't lose strenght |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
blackmagic
Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2003 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah! I mean wat the point in having a ship that cost more than a cruiser and weakens? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Nemesis
Vice Admiral
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
Posts: 452
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2003 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| it's stupid |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
adamx17
2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 160
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2003 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How about like a 100/200 cruiser that s/d? If it fires first, you lose 40 points (cuz it'd be 100 mp). However, if it gets shot and then goes, it will have saved you a ship (at least 60 points) and kill a cruiser. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
adamx17
2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 160
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2003 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| How about like a 100/200 cruiser that s/d? If it fires first, you lose 40 points (cuz it'd be 100 mp). However, if it gets shot and then goes, it will have saved you a ship (at least 60 points) and kill a cruiser. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2003 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
try another one! 
Greetings |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 20, 2003 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is an impossible invention
Can't be added.
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2003 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hey waht about a ship class 3 50/50 with a cost of 35 and i dont know if is a s/d or not waht do you think? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2003 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
On 2003-07-23 03:34, Rubens wrote:
hey waht about a ship class 3 50/50 with a cost of 35 and i dont know if is a s/d or not waht do you think?
|
USELESS!!!!
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
JaM
Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not needed!
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| sorry i want say 25 mp and 40/40 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
mackman
Vice Admiral
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 597
Location: Orlando, Florida
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thumbs down...I vote no! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
25 mp for 40/40???
Unbalanced
And Forgot that
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| so the egale is unbalanced? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 4:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ask that to the Admin of Space Trace
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| admin give me an answer to this this ship is unbalanaced? so i think the eagle is unbalanced or not? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
C.Kork
1st Lieutenant
Joined: 26 Jul 2003
Posts: 37
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
hey, how about a cruiser with 1/1 ap/lp and 500 mp? wouldn't that be much better??!!??
**note the sarcasm |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
