 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
50% |
[ 1 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
50% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 2 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:05 pm Post subject: absorber mine |
|
|
absorber mine (class 1 ship)
the absorber mine works in a incredibly complex method. firstly, it detects class 1 and class 2 ships within a radius of 0.5 ly. then, using plasmaneuron technology, the mine with it¸s 4 quater circles generates an outer absorbing mechanism, so that when the mine has detected a c1 or c2 ship, it suck its self in and the ship with it too. the mine has funnels for the ships to go in. in the centre of the mine is an atomic exploder, which when collided with a ship atomatically self destructs.
attack/life: 0/1
manpower: 1
researchtime: 2 d 12 h
buildingtime: 12 h
 human-technology
needed research:
dark tactics
battle details:fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
self destructs!
(battle engine syntax: sd) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Nuten Spesh L
1st Lieutenant
Joined: 09 Feb 2007
Posts: 44
Location: Out in the wastelands.
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Mp needs to be increased if it is to be used against c2's. Something like a 5 or 6. Would be a point gain against many c2's but certanly a looser aganst c1's and the attack against c1's & c2's should be able to carry over from one sub battle to another, just like a real mine would not become ineffective at the end of the c1 battle. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Dinskydude
Admiral
Joined: 18 May 2006
Posts: 854
Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Europe, Earth
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wth?  the Battle Syntax, which i always read first btw, Says that it has no attack whatsoever, and will selfdestruct after it has "fought"...
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
SkyFire
Captain
Joined: 29 Jan 2007
Posts: 121
Location: Slovenia
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why do people always come up with those silly "destroys stuff in radius of x sectors" inventions.. it's not implementable in the syntax. Stick to the syntax or present your radical-game-changing-ideas in another thread 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
|
