View previous topic :: View next topic |
this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
this can be added to the game |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
no good try another one |
|
60% |
[ 3 ] |
|
Total Votes : 5 |
|
Author |
Message |
tec_server Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:15 pm Post subject: unfinished holo clone |
|
|
unfinished holo clone (class 3 ship)
this ship is like the holo clone ship but then in class 3, it will clone the ship it´s fighting with, but it will also subtract 50 ap of itself, as it needs loads of power to feed the semi unstable clone generator. afterwards it will fight.
attack/life: 0/15
manpower: 30
researchtime: 2 d
buildingtime: 14 h
human-technology
needed research:
holo technology
battle details:clones the enemy ship that is the actual target
(battle engine syntax: clone)
modifies AP/LP by -50/0 of itself in your own fleet in the same class
(battle engine syntax: mod,self,1,this,itself,+,-50,0)
fights
(battle engine syntax: f) |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Dinskydude Admiral
Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 854 Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Europe, Earth
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This ship was made by MJ and me, over MSN. _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
kamekaze6 Admiral
Joined: 12 Aug 2003 Posts: 1312 Location: Malta
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To start with all holo ships are Eray, so it can't be human. _________________ STFU N00B!!!!111!1!
Click!! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Dinskydude Admiral
Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 854 Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Europe, Earth
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I forgot to add that:
This technology was taken from the E-rays when a real holo clone ship crashed on Reach(colonized by humans; see Halo), the ship was taken apart, and rebuild to a new ship. But this ship rejected by the Human Council of warfare, and left in the science center where it was made. The science center was destroyed by Myciloyd troops later. After a few hndred years humans dug it up, and started to use it for patrol reasons. _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Dinskydude Admiral
Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 854 Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Europe, Earth
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And if i'm not mistaken, humans can build E-ray techs. _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
al12 Admiral
Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Posts: 844
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, but the holo technology is of the eray. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
kamekaze6 Admiral
Joined: 12 Aug 2003 Posts: 1312 Location: Malta
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While we're at it the humans stole Reconstructor technology from the Mycelloids oh and the Nanites stole EMP technology from the Kazuula and how about the Kazuula in response stole the nano technology. In fact why not delete all races and have everyone build everything?!
I'll tell you why because it would be unbalanced. As you say human can build E-ray tech anyway, But nanites will be able to build this ship and they can't do holo tech. People have tried to roleplay races stealing technology from eachother. There was a suggestion for a human emp vessel which was shot down immediately. It is the difference in races which gives them their unique touch stop trying to change that. _________________ STFU N00B!!!!111!1!
Click!! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
DavAlan Admiral
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 Posts: 778 Location: Palo Alto, California
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 11:59 pm Post subject: Re: unfinished holo clone |
|
|
tec_server wrote: | unfinished holo clone (class 3 ship)
this ship is like the holo clone ship but then in class 3, it will clone the ship it´s fighting with, but it will also subtract 50 ap of itself, as it needs loads of power to feed the semi unstable clone generator. afterwards it will fight.
attack/life: 0/15
manpower: 30
researchtime: 2 d
buildingtime: 14 h
human-technology
needed research:
holo technology
battle details:clones the enemy ship that is the actual target
(battle engine syntax: clone)
modifies AP/LP by -50/0 of itself in your own fleet in the same class
(battle engine syntax: mod,self,1,this,itself,+,-50,0)
fights
(battle engine syntax: f) |
OK the "disadvantage" is non-existant as the thing HAS no ap to reduce 50 of *doh*...or would it reduce 50 ap of "itself" after cloning something else since it would no longer be "itself" (and using that syntax).
So this thing is the same as the clone cruiser already found on nanolaure...but being so low on mp cost, is also very unbalanced (against almost any possible combination of c3) correct??? _________________ "Destruction leads to a very rough road
But it also breeds creation
And earthquakes are to a girl's guitar
They are just another good vibration
And tidal waves couldn't save the world
From Californication"
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Californication
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlUKcNNmywk
___________________________________
https://www.facebook.com/david.brass.524 |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Dinskydude Admiral
Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 854 Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Europe, Earth
|
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kamekaze6 wrote: | While we're at it the humans stole Reconstructor technology from the Mycelloids oh and the Nanites stole EMP technology from the Kazuula and how about the Kazuula in response stole the nano technology. In fact why not delete all races and have everyone build everything?!
I'll tell you why because it would be unbalanced. As you say human can build E-ray tech anyway, But nanites will be able to build this ship and they can't do holo tech. People have tried to roleplay races stealing technology from eachother. There was a suggestion for a human emp vessel which was shot down immediately. It is the difference in races which gives them their unique touch stop trying to change that. | No,, they can't build it, as they can't resarch holo technology. _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Dinskydude Admiral
Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 854 Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Europe, Earth
|
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:30 pm Post subject: Re: unfinished holo clone |
|
|
DavAlan wrote: | tec_server wrote: | unfinished holo clone (class 3 ship)
this ship is like the holo clone ship but then in class 3, it will clone the ship it´s fighting with, but it will also subtract 50 ap of itself, as it needs loads of power to feed the semi unstable clone generator. afterwards it will fight.
attack/life: 0/15
manpower: 30
researchtime: 2 d
buildingtime: 14 h
human-technology
needed research:
holo technology
battle details:clones the enemy ship that is the actual target
(battle engine syntax: clone)
modifies AP/LP by -50/0 of itself in your own fleet in the same class
(battle engine syntax: mod,self,1,this,itself,+,-50,0)
fights
(battle engine syntax: f) |
OK the "disadvantage" is non-existant as the thing HAS no ap to reduce 50 of *doh*...or would it reduce 50 ap of "itself" after cloning something else since it would no longer be "itself" (and using that syntax).
So this thing is the same as the clone cruiser already found on nanolaure...but being so low on mp cost, is also very unbalanced (against almost any possible combination of c3) correct??? |
1. Mmmh, couldn't find a holo cruiser...
2. It would take off the AP after cloning, and yes, it might be a bit unbalanced with plasma gunships, but hey, that's life, it's the same with the buildable holo clone thingy vs a couple of plague ships : they infect ur whole fleet. i think it's just luck you need to score points with this. _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
al12 Admiral
Joined: 17 Apr 2006 Posts: 844
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | No,, they can't build it, as they can't resarch holo technology. |
humans can resarch holo clone technology because they can resarch eray technology. have a look in the manual. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Dinskydude Admiral
Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 854 Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Europe, Earth
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I WASN'T TALKING ABOUT HUMANS, BUT BOUT NANITES!!! _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Dinskydude Admiral
Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 854 Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Europe, Earth
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's why i quoted. _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
kamekaze6 Admiral
Joined: 12 Aug 2003 Posts: 1312 Location: Malta
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So basically Kazuula can't build it?! _________________ STFU N00B!!!!111!1!
Click!! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Failtrip1 Vice Admiral
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 436
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:38 pm Post subject: Re: unfinished holo clone |
|
|
Dinskydude wrote: |
1. Mmmh, couldn't find a holo cruiser...
|
Since Dave lacks of time I took the liberty to post this....
clone cruiser (class 3 ship)
this ship make a clone of the enemy ship. T
attack/life: 0/100
manpower: 90
researchtime: 1 d
buildingtime: 12 h
e-ray-technology
needed research:
holo technology
battle details:
clones the enemy ship that is the actual target
battlemessage: "clone cruiser clones ... ships"
(battle engine syntax: clone,clone cruiser clones)
—> Forum Topic about this ship
darklim: Someone explain me: the cloned ships will be you ship or the enemy ship?? (In this syntax)
JaM: It is your ship.
masterp: is it cloned only for the actual battle?
Dragonspawn: isnt there already a ship like this?
JaM: Yes it is only for the actual SUBbattle, and yes there is a ship like this in class 2 for the e-rays: holo-clone-ship _________________ http://toptenproxysites.com/
http://www.chooseyourproxy.com/ |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
T2 Admiral
Joined: 26 Mar 2005 Posts: 1398 Location: Ontario
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps I misread the syntax and description but....this ship self-destructs just before it goes to actual battle.
By subtracting 50 lp from a 15 lp ship, it's really dead...unreconstructable dead...so dead, there is not a piece big enough to even detect.
Also...it is way too light to be a c3 ship.
Next Please... |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Failtrip1 Vice Admiral
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 436
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
T2 Admiral
Joined: 26 Mar 2005 Posts: 1398 Location: Ontario
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So right Failtrip1. Fresh eyes after sleep does make a difference. Funny...I double checked before I posted as well.
Can a ship have negative AP ? |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Dinskydude Admiral
Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 854 Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Europe, Earth
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
er no, so what? ships without AP, that are cloned, will just do the effect they used to do.
btw, T2, your number of posts is evil:
T2
Admiral
Joined: 26 Mar 2005
Posts: 666
Location: Canada
lol _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
|