| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
33% |
[ 3 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
55% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 9 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Scipio Africanus
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 379
Location: North Cal USA
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Noxus
Vice Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 493
Location: Michigan, USA
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
not the worst.. i could see using this..
with a hammer this would be dominate..
this is probably too strong.. so i have to say no..
alittle confused.. the way i see it is that two hammers and this ship against 150 destroys i think this would win.. thats the way it sounds like by the syntax..
so if it is that case then way too powerful
_________________
-==Frag the Weak, Hurdle the Dead.==- |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
DavAlan
Admiral
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 778
Location: Palo Alto, California
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Noxus wrote: | not the worst.. i could see using this..
with a hammer this would be dominate..
this is probably too strong.. so i have to say no..
alittle confused.. the way i see it is that two hammers and this ship against 150 destroys i think this would win.. thats the way it sounds like by the syntax..
so if it is that case then way too powerful |
Simply put, a "c2 bounty hunter" may be a good idea but too strong if it also has ap as that gives it the abillity to damage AND then blast a c3 or >
Note the bounty hunter can not damage its target as it has no ap and requires damage be done 1st by other c1.
_________________
"Destruction leads to a very rough road
But it also breeds creation
And earthquakes are to a girl's guitar
They are just another good vibration
And tidal waves couldn't save the world
From Californication"
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Californication
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlUKcNNmywk
___________________________________
https://www.facebook.com/david.brass.524 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Noxus
Vice Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2006
Posts: 493
Location: Michigan, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DavAlan wrote: | | Noxus wrote: | not the worst.. i could see using this..
with a hammer this would be dominate..
this is probably too strong.. so i have to say no..
alittle confused.. the way i see it is that two hammers and this ship against 150 destroys i think this would win.. thats the way it sounds like by the syntax..
so if it is that case then way too powerful |
Simply put, a "c2 bounty hunter" may be a good idea but too strong if it also has ap as that gives it the abillity to damage AND then blast a c3 or >
Note the bounty hunter can not damage its target as it has no ap and requires damage be done 1st by other c1. |
o yeah.. i totally looked over that Dav... good point.. lol..
yeah not a good idea.. this thing could take out a mothership by itself.. lol 
_________________
-==Frag the Weak, Hurdle the Dead.==- |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Scipio Africanus
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 379
Location: North Cal USA
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
iuztheevil
Commander
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 86
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, we already have a bounty hunter. This would (IMHO) make it way to easy to use hammers and blast to wreak havok with fleets. It totally bypasses the c1 battle....as long as your hammer goes off, you can destroy c2, whereas you would have to clear the c1 first to use hammer/BH combo...and with attack as well....way too much...someone was  |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Scipio Africanus
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 379
Location: North Cal USA
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
you cant really make a new ship without it being like another. And besides that how can you vote no for the Trireme and yes for the Brireme,
there like a set. Having the other two without this one is piontless
_________________
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/883/templarknightrp9.gif |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
eraer
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 222
Location: Heaven
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| it ap is fine just the sytax with the it destroys damaged ships makes it strong |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
DavAlan
Admiral
Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Posts: 778
Location: Palo Alto, California
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 28, 2006 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Scipio Africanus wrote: | you cant really make a new ship without it being like another. And besides that how can you vote no for the Trireme and yes for the Brireme,
there like a set. Having the other two without this one is piontless |
Note to Scipio: admin gets the final say so on ships in spite of the "votes". Very, very few ships make it even with 100% "voter approval".
The noobs approve of almost anything as they know almost nothing about ship inventing / balancing / etc while the vets ignore most of them and if they do examine one almost always disapprove.
_________________
"Destruction leads to a very rough road
But it also breeds creation
And earthquakes are to a girl's guitar
They are just another good vibration
And tidal waves couldn't save the world
From Californication"
Red Hot Chili Peppers - Californication
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlUKcNNmywk
___________________________________
https://www.facebook.com/david.brass.524 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Scipio Africanus
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 379
Location: North Cal USA
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
