| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
25% |
[ 1 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
25% |
[ 1 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
50% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 4 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 5:21 pm Post subject: portable defense aray |
|
|
portable defense aray (class 1 ship)
the portabledefense aray is a weaker copy of your planets defense aray. that is it only protects 10 of your ships
attack/life: 200/1000
manpower: 700
researchtime: 3 d
buildingtime: 1 d 12 h
 nanite-technology
needed research:
science recycle methods
battle details:fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
tries to generate a shield around 10 ships in your fleet in the same class it is fighting
(battle engine syntax: shield,10) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
kamekaze6
Admiral
Joined: 12 Aug 2003
Posts: 1312
Location: Malta
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It s completely different from the defense array but the idea of multiple shields from one ship is a cool idea
_________________
STFU N00B!!!!111!1!
Click!! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 7:34 pm Post subject: Re: portable defense aray |
|
|
| tec_server wrote: | portable defense aray (class 1 ship)
the portabledefense aray is a weaker copy of your planets defense aray. that is it only protects 10 of your ships
attack/life: 200/1000
manpower: 700
researchtime: 3 d
buildingtime: 1 d 12 h
nanite-technology
needed research:
science recycle methods
battle details:fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
tries to generate a shield around 10 ships in your fleet in the same class it is fighting
(battle engine syntax: shield,10) |
With that syntax it cant be added |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Knight of Truth
Admiral
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 2011
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its a good idea. Although the syntax has to be cahnegd. I vote yes!
_________________
[img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/599/kot2ks1.jpg[/img]
| MicroJak wrote: |
For fuck's sake would you both please stop fucking swearing!!!! |
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Knight of Truth wrote: | | Its a good idea. Although the syntax has to be cahnegd. I vote yes! |
What a contradictory thing.
If you vote yes you are voting to add this ship. So its added..and then? Plz think a little, just give the suggestion, if the syntax is bad you cant vote yes, just because this shouldnt be the ship added
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Knight of Truth
Admiral
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 2011
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The sybtax has to be changed, but the ship is good! I like the what the ship is supposed to do.
_________________
[img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/599/kot2ks1.jpg[/img]
| MicroJak wrote: |
For fuck's sake would you both please stop fucking swearing!!!! |
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens
Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Knight of Truth wrote: | | The sybtax has to be changed, but the ship is good! I like the what the ship is supposed to do. |
Well!!!! Why to vote yes if this is just an idea and not the ship?...
And i am not the agree, i dont see how the idea of a c1 acting like a DA is good |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
lilkrnboi1018
Admiral
Joined: 16 Apr 2005
Posts: 1182
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wait... how come wen i came to a near similar idea, it was shot down?!
_________________
PWNAGE!
Gotta love the Magnum (RE 0-3)
Or the Eagle (RE 3)
Leader of DEFIANCE
The grounds are soaked... with your blood! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Grim Fandango
Lieutenant Commander
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 58
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 3:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
LOL cuz they just felt like shooting u down  |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
