| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
50% |
[ 3 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
50% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 6 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tyrant (class 3 ship)
a monsterous ship with few equals but can be swamped by lessr ships...
attack/life: 300/550
manpower: 500
researchtime: 4 d
buildingtime: 12 h
 nanite-technology
needed research:
gravity
battle details:fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
reduces LP to 0 of 10 ships of any ship-type in the enemy fleet in all classes but some ships are immune against destruction
(battle engine syntax: destroy,enemy,10,all,all)
reduces LP to 0 of 4 ships of any ship-type in the enemy fleet in all classes but some ships are immune against destruction
(battle engine syntax: destroy,enemy,4,all,all)
reduces LP to 0 of 4 ships of any ship-type in the enemy fleet in the same class but some ships are immune against destruction
(battle engine syntax: destroy,enemy,4,this,all)
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Brutus
Vice Admiral
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 428
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Which ships are immune and which not? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
hell_fire
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Posts: 266
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| it looks to me like you got to much syntex could just be the way i am trying to read it |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Exile
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 17
Location: england
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
No ship is immune, thats the whole point of it. its about time the game had a ship that could fight on its own.
_________________
Exile |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
hell_fire
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Posts: 266
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yes that is true but it would almost deffeat the entire purpose of having an actual fleet
_________________
thy dreams are of the other world in which we live
http://www.freewebs.com/1cbk/ |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Elder
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 13 Feb 2005
Posts: 349
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Long live the mycelloids: Reconstructors!
Goodbye to this ship. Still a nice invention, but not worth adding it. Sorry to the inventor, but i think this is the truth |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Exile
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Posts: 17
Location: england
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yea your right, i just designed it to kick ass. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
kandos-
Vice Admiral
Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Posts: 649
Location: England
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so many people design ships for their own purpose, but to get a ship into the game it has to be balanced, it has to have equal good points and bad points, and it has to be useful to everyone...
greetz
Martini
~ Totaly Total Ownage ~
_________________
chuck norris would Totaly Own this galaxy! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
