| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
42% |
[ 6 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
14% |
[ 2 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
7% |
[ 1 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
35% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 14 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server Technology Bot

Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
xpenguin (class 2 ship)
a stronger destroyer, that recycles itself at the end of any fleet confrontations (caution! recycle!)
attack/life: 40/10
manpower: 8
researchtime: 2 d
buildingtime: 12 h
mycilloid-technology
needed research:
science recycle methods
battle details:fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
after the fight of each subbattle of your class 4 it recycles itself in your own fleet in class 2, the targets are removed from the fight, but no points are won or lost.
(battle engine syntax: event,4,recycle,self,all,2,itself)
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
steven1982 Admiral


Joined: 24 Oct 2003 Posts: 970 Location: Zwolle, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
nah i think this won't do any good, it's cheaper then the penguing. The penguing is allready very strong.
Allthough this might bring some nice new tactics, i still think this will be to strong, having 2 classes with such destructive power. The penguing is not only harder to use because of it's recycle, but also because it is class one, so you will have to clean other classes first fot it to be usefull, this ship only makes this easier, and even lower on MP for the same lp.
I say it's to dangerous.
Greets
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
goldinage Captain


Joined: 22 Dec 2004 Posts: 120 Location: IN,USA
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Steven for ounce i agree with you. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
silent1 1st Lieutenant


Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 34
|
Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| is 4 x more than the penguin! how can you say it cost less than the penguin, the only ship like that is the fighter that you start off with. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Dutchbatter Admiral


Joined: 19 Dec 2003 Posts: 848 Location: Hardenberg, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The penguin has 4 attack points and 1 life point.
The Xpenguin has 40 attack points and 10 life points.
So, the attack points is x 10 and the life points is x 10.
1 penguin is 1 mp if we do 1 mp x 10 is 10 mp. The xpenguin has 8 mp.
And indeed, the penguin is c1, so you have to clean up c1 before.
But the otherside. With the normal penguin you can score in c2, c3 and c4 and with the right combinations in c1 too.
The xpenguin is only usefull c3 and c4 and with the right combination in c2 too.
So if the xpenguin gets 10 mp in case of 8 mp, than it is not more powerfull than the normal penguin. There are less classes where you can score with.
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Anonymous Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I dont really thing is a good idea. There is already a penguin and it's very powerful, so if you make this xpenguin it will be relly deadly and the misiloid are going to have and edge in the battles.
Besides, The misiloids have really good strategys to perform, but the Kazuuula doesn't have much at all. I think tha they need some new ships too. The other day i was looking at their ships and the ones that i found useful were in other race and upgraded, for example the "flying saucer" means nothing against the scout of the humans, I think what really needs to be done is something about this.
And again whit the whole xpenguing is too strong and cheap. you need to do something about that. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
KEPcH Vice Admiral

Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 487
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lol, I count like -1 fighter has 1ap and 1mp, penguin 4 and 1, so 4 x strentgh of fighter for same mp.
-1 destroyer has 10 ap and 8mp, xpenguin 40 and 8, so 4 x strentgh of destroyer for same mp.
So they look equal to me. But not really necessary at all. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Lord Jürgen Vice Admiral

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 457 Location: Papendrecht, Holland!!!!!!!
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can say it much shorter: IT'S CRAP!!
_________________ Commander of the Kirbys |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
KEPcH Vice Admiral

Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 487
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah, but then again, you don't know what you're sayin right? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Dutchbatter Admiral


Joined: 19 Dec 2003 Posts: 848 Location: Hardenberg, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But indeed kepch. Ship is right, nothing wrong with, but we don't need it.
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
KEPcH Vice Admiral

Joined: 14 Jul 2003 Posts: 487
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm happy with a normal penguin.
Please don't come with a XLpenguin (class 3 ship)
ap/lp: 400/100
Just sayin it in advance. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Dutchbatter Admiral


Joined: 19 Dec 2003 Posts: 848 Location: Hardenberg, the Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i hope everybody will read this and listen to it
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Brutus Vice Admiral

Joined: 11 Jan 2005 Posts: 428
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, one penguin is powerfull enough.
It doesnt make any sense |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Lord Jürgen Vice Admiral

Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 457 Location: Papendrecht, Holland!!!!!!!
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2005 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thats why i said it was crap
_________________ Commander of the Kirbys |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
|