Top 10

[Metody I The Evil]

Currently, the top10 stats is anything but accurate. The top10 before the respawn-system was a good indicator indeed, it practically answered the question "How many points has the player made", or, to perephrase it, "How many points has the player made for the 30 days that passed since the round started" for example.

Now, with the respawns, the top10 answers the question: "Who has the highest points now", but then again, it doesn't represent the "top" part

I suggest that the top10 has a slightly different approach - instead of showing the score, it should show score, divided by evolution. For example:

Player 1 - 10 000 points and is 20% evolved
Player 2 - 7 000 points and is 10% evolved.

The coefficients would be: P1 = 500 and P2 - 700, thusly P2 will be above P1 in the top10. Thusly, the one who scores more in less time will be shown to be better than the one who has more but in a long period of time. Which, in my opinion would show that P2 is a better player than P1

I think it's easier to program, it just adds a division instead of showing the original score

It can also be a completely new stats, e.g. it can be the top10 and the original point-based top10 can be renamed to "High scores"

What do you guys think?

_________________
_____________________________________________
"Unity creates power"
Khan Kubrat to his 5 sons

[no clutch]

I like this idea. When I look at the stats I would like to see some sort of indicater of the players level of ability. This way I could look at the stats and choose a target to test myself or avoid depending on my level of ability.

[Dutchbatter]

Yes i agree, the top 10 was good for the round sytems. But now everybody start at an other day.

So, just a percentage of the score. Just in forum you see, % of messages a day.

[Rince]

Indeed, the TopTen-list should get an update.

I like Metodys idea, but it need a little change. If you score 2000 points with an evolution rate of 2% = 1000. So, you're able to get into the topten by one single attack. Maybe the minimum evolution rate to get into the topten could be set at 10 or 15%.

[Metody I The Evil]

*lightbulb smiley ^^*

Or, even better, it can be both - the 10 highest scores, but sorted by their points/time ratio

_________________
_____________________________________________
"Unity creates power"
Khan Kubrat to his 5 sons

[admin]

very good idea, we will implement that

[Shade]

Hey admins..

We've been waiting a few months for this very much needed idea!

any chances it will be implemented soon??
If it's to much work, could we not atleast show the players evo in the top 10 or something?

gogogogogo!!



_________________
!! Total Ownage !!

[kandos-]

yeah just what i was thinking! (well not really i just felt like spamming!!)

cough cough...

[Guidop]

i like the idea

but i'm new why is the round systen lost then


the advantage i think in round system is that everybody has an equal evolution

if players start in the middle for example new players than let them have the research immidiate for the days they missed

[promethius2]

This shuold be added (if possible) for alliances too.

ADD IT!
ADD IT!
ADD IT!

_________________
Calvin: I'm a genius, but I'm a misunderstood genius.
Hobbes: What's misunderstood about you?
Calvin: Nobody thinks I'm a genius.

[Rubens]

i already thought it and said it, but seems like methody can explain better
we neeed it!!!but when i thought it i had the same problem of rice,and i never got a solution, i think a 10% of minimal evolution will be good. I mean maybe the one who wins 2k pts in his first day wont has the same lucky or the same targets the next day, but if he can continue about his 10% of evolution it will shown how good is him.