View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
blackmagic Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 1157 Location: GP
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Check this out. I'm not to sure wat happened, but i have some idea. Look at these two battle reports. Same fleet setup except for an extra campaign ship, but different outcome.
yours: 555 ships
class 2:
548 destroyers (10/10, 8 MP)
1 campaign ship (0/10, 45 MP)
class 3:
5 cruisers (100/100, 60 MP)
class 4:
1 mothership (0/1000, 320 MP)
enemy: 90 ships
class 1:
4 fighters (1/1, 1 MP)
class 3:
86 cruisers (100/100, 60 MP)
class 4:
buildings:
1 transwarp-network (0/100, 0 MP)
1 defensive array (0/500, 0 MP)
1 research center (0/3500, 0 MP)
1 shipyard (0/3500, 0 MP)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
your class 2 vs enemy class 1: V ^
you:
548 destroyers
1 campaign ship
enemy:
4 fighters
4 destroyers vs 4 fighters
3 fighters vs 1 destroyer
losses:
you :
-
enemy :
4 fighters
score in this subbattle: 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
your class 2 vs enemy class 3: V ^
you:
548 destroyers
1 campaign ship
enemy:
86 cruisers
860 destroyers vs 86 cruisers
1 campaign ship distracts the fleet.
all remaining ships reassemble for another strike after 421 ships
86 cruisers vs 86 destroyers
losses:
you :
86 destroyers
1 campaign ship
enemy :
86 cruisers
score in this subbattle: 4427
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
your class 3 vs enemy class 4: V ^
you:
5 cruisers
enemy:
1 shipyard
1 research center
1 transwarp-network
1 defensive array
4 cruisers vs 1 defensive array
1 cruiser vs 1 transwarp-network
1 defensive array defends in class 3: 1 ship
1 defensive array defends in class 2: 10 ships
losses:
you :
10 destroyers
1 cruiser
enemy :
1 transwarp-network
score in this subbattle: -140
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
your class 4 vs enemy class 4: V ^
you:
1 mothership
enemy:
1 shipyard
1 research center
1 defensive array
1 defensive array defends in class 3: 1 ship
1 defensive array defends in class 2: 10 ships
losses:
you :
10 destroyers
1 cruiser
enemy :
-
score in this subbattle: -140
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
summary:
your losses:
class 2:
106 destroyers
1 campaign ship
class 3:
2 cruisers
enemy losses:
class 1:
4 fighters
class 3:
86 cruisers
class 4:
buildings:
1 transwarp-network
score: 4151
THIS WAS THE FIRST BATTLE. THE ONE BELOW IS THE OTHER ONE:
yours: 516 ships
class 1:
1 fighter (1/1, 1 MP)
2 mosquitoes (0/3, 1 MP)
class 2:
509 destroyers (10/10, 8 MP)
2 campaign ships (0/10, 45 MP)
class 3:
1 cruiser (100/100, 60 MP)
class 4:
1 mothership (0/1000, 320 MP)
enemy: 90 ships
class 1:
4 fighters (1/1, 1 MP)
class 3:
86 cruisers (100/100, 60 MP)
class 4:
buildings:
1 transwarp-network (0/100, 0 MP)
1 research center (0/3500, 0 MP)
1 shipyard (0/3500, 0 MP)
your class 1 vs enemy class 1: V ^
you:
1 fighter
2 mosquitoes
enemy:
4 fighters
1 fighter vs 1 fighter
3 fighters vs 1 mosquito
1 fighter vs 1 mosquito
losses:
you :
1 mosquito
enemy :
1 fighter
score in this subbattle: 0
your class 2 vs enemy class 3: V ^
you:
509 destroyers
2 campaign ships
enemy:
86 cruisers
500 destroyers vs 50 cruisers
8 destroyers vs 1 cruiser
1 campaign ship losses: 1 ship
1 campaign ship distracts the fleet.
all remaining ships reassemble for another strike after 75 ships
86 cruisers vs 86 destroyers
losses:
you :
86 destroyers
2 campaign ships
enemy :
50 cruisers
score in this subbattle: 2222
your class 3 vs enemy class 3: V ^
you:
1 cruiser
enemy:
36 cruisers
1 cruiser vs 1 cruiser
losses:
you :
1 cruiser
enemy :
-
score in this subbattle: -60
your class 4 vs enemy class 4: V ^
you:
1 mothership
enemy:
1 shipyard
1 research center
1 transwarp-network
losses:
you :
-
enemy :
-
score in this subbattle: 0
summary:
your losses:
class 1:
1 mosquito
class 2:
86 destroyers
2 campaign ships
class 3:
1 cruiser
enemy losses:
class 1:
1 fighter
class 3:
50 cruisers
score: 2162
so wat exactly happened? |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
An offer you cant refuse Commander
Joined: 16 May 2004 Posts: 93 Location: The cold hard streets of Chicago
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Battle 1
1 campaign ship distracts the fleet.
all remaining ships reassemble for another strike after 421 ships
Battle 2
1 campaign ship distracts the fleet.
all remaining ships reassemble for another strike after 75 ships
The campaign ship had a far greater effect in the first battle, with about 6 times more ships firing twice. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
mackman Vice Admiral
Joined: 15 Jan 2003 Posts: 597 Location: Orlando, Florida
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
But still it doesnt make sense.When the campainship gets active all remianing ships should fire he fought the same amount of cruisers in both battles so why not all of the destroyers -minus the 86 re-assemble?
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: mackman on 2004-06-03 05:00 ] |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Lord Lou Commander
Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 76
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 5:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
point is When campaign ship reactivates:
in 1st battle:
all remaining ships reassemble for another strike after 421 ships
in 2nd battle:
all remaining ships reassemble for another strike after 75 ships
so first time your fleet attacked again with 421 ships, and in second battle your ships attacked attacked again for 75.
It is ranomized, when will ur campaign ship activate, and less u have them, the better for you. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
An offer you cant refuse Commander
Joined: 16 May 2004 Posts: 93 Location: The cold hard streets of Chicago
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, when the campaign ship activated in the second battle, those 75 ships that were supposed to be reshuffled into the fleet were already dead, so they had no effect whatsoever.
The first battle really worked out nicely for you, because those 421 ships really did the damage of about 760 ships. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
blackmagic Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 1157 Location: GP
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you sure it wasn't some glitch? It really shouldn't have mattered if i had two campaign ships because once one activates the other one is destroyed. But why did only 75 ships attack in the battle, when I had a lot more surviving ships than that? |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Tofu Commander
Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First battle:
turn 1 to 421: 421 destroyers attacks
turn 422: the surviving destroyers are reassembled (421-86=335)
turn 423-end: the reassembled 335 and the remaining 127 destroyers attack
total attacks: 421+335+127=883
Second battle:
turn 1 to 75: 75 destroyers attack
turn 76: the surviving destroyers are reassembled (75-86=0)
turn 77-end: the reassembled 0 and the remaining 434 destroyers attack
total attacks: 75+0+434=509
The turn in which the campaign ship reassembles is random, so it´s better to take only 1 campaign ship, because this will increase your chances of firing late (not like the comando fighter). |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Lord Lou Commander
Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 76
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OMG
battle 1:
1st destroyer fires
2nd destroyer fires
3rd destroyer fires
......
421st destroyer fires
campaign ship activates and all thsoe 421 destroyers reasemble for new strike + remaining 100 destroyers (totaly you fire with 900 destroyers in that sub battle)
900 ~ 421 * 2 + 100
-----------------------------------------------
battle 2
1st destroyer fires
2nd destroyer fires
3rd destroyer fires
......
75th destroyer fires
campaign ship activates and all thsoe 75 destroyers reasemble for new strike + remaining 420 destroyers (totaly you fire with 560 destroyers in that sub battle)
560 ~ 75*2 + 420
OK ?
_________________ Protector of Weak, and Defender of Small.
...and I will strike down with great vengance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brotherin, and u will now my name is the Lord, when I lay my vengance upon you! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
blackmagic Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003 Posts: 1157 Location: GP
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah i understand the randomization, but the thing is, is that this has never happened before. Every time i had used the campaign ship,it has always fired late. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Lord Lou Commander
Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 76
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Your luck just ran out |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Tofu Commander
Joined: 07 Sep 2003 Posts: 78
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do you mean me with "OMG", Lou?
Quotes from the BR:
Quote: | 860 destroyers vs 86 cruisers |
Quote: | 500 destroyers vs 50 cruisers
8 destroyers vs 1 cruiser |
Quotes from my calculation:
Quote: | total attacks: 421+335+127=883 |
There were only 335 destroyers reassembled, because 86 where destroyed by the cruisers before reassembling.
More than 860 couldn´t fire, because the enemy had only 86 cruisers.
Quote: | total attacks: 75+0+434=509 |
Actually only 508 shot, because a cruiser had the first turn.
There were no destroyers reassembled, because they where destroyed before reassembling.
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Lord Lou Commander
Joined: 11 May 2004 Posts: 76
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
No tofu, I didn't mean you, but. I said 1st battle ~ 900 destroyers shoot
but you saw only 860, others left out of targets.
as for 2nd battle ~ 600, more about 590, others didn't fire couse 86 cruisers shoot them down before they could fire, but other 500 (or 508) fired.
I think I made ti clear, enough. I'll end it here.
_________________ Protector of Weak, and Defender of Small.
...and I will strike down with great vengance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brotherin, and u will now my name is the Lord, when I lay my vengance upon you! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
|