Recent topics Log in
Search Profile
Memberlist Usergroups
Log in to check your private messages
Register
queenship
Post new topic   Reply to topic
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » Impossible inventions » queenship
View previous topic :: View next topic  

this vote will decide about the future of this invention:
this can be added to the game
50%
 50%  [ 2 ]
it needs some changes but it is a good invention
25%
 25%  [ 1 ]
i will post the needed changes here
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
no good try another one
25%
 25%  [ 1 ]
Total Votes : 4

Author Message
tec_server
Technology Bot
Technology Bot


Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746

 Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2004 8:53 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

queenship (class 4 ship)

this is a faster, more stable mothership that travels at transwarp 10 (or infinite warp). this is a more environment friendly ship that does not contaminate space.


attack/life: 0/400
manpower: 400


speed: warp 10
researchtime: 2 d
buildingtime: 12 h


nanite-technology
needed research:
improved field theories

battle details:
battle engine syntax:
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
compu_head
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 416
Location: Waterford, Republic of Ireland

 Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2004 9:02 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I hope you like it
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
LaddyApple
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander


Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Posts: 66

 Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2004 9:03 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I like it, this ship should be added A.S.A.P. It would be faster to going to BH or just a war target that is far away.

_________________
Many fleets will come,
Many fleets will fall,
But at the end,
The true warrior will prevail.
Leader of Warriors of Chaos
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
1st Rear Admiral


Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany

 Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2004 9:10 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

more mp! it's not balanced!


Greets
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
adamx17
2nd Rear Admiral
2nd Rear Admiral


Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Posts: 160

 Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2004 9:12 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Yeah right. A ship that has warp 10 should definetely be more than 400 mp. The Timeslipper is 1000 mp and it only goes warp 8. It does have an attack of 250, but that really shouldn't account for much of the manpower put into it. I would say that a ship that goes warp 10 should be more than 1000 manpower, especially with a name like "queenship".
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
compu_head
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Posts: 416
Location: Waterford, Republic of Ireland

 Post Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 4:03 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I will increase the mp
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
tiemen
2nd Lieutenant
2nd Lieutenant


Joined: 07 May 2004
Posts: 28
Location: The Netherlands

 Post Posted: Sun May 23, 2004 1:24 pm    Post subject:

Great ship... thnx for increasing the MP...

_________________
"Once upon a midnight dreary, there he pondered, weak and weary, over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore. And his eyes had all the seeming of a student's that is reading, reading through one too many bindings of long-outdated bore.”
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » Impossible inventions » queenship
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Solaris phpBB theme/template by Jakob Persson
Copyright © Jakob Persson 2003



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Impressum