| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
80% |
[ 8 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 10 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2003 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
paralyzer (class 3 ship)
this ship paralyzes fleets by destroying all class 4 ships, hence leaving them with no warp fields
attack/life: 0/100
manpower: 2024
researchtime: 2 d
buildingtime: 20 h
 e-ray-technology
needed research:
advanced tactics
battle details:
multiplies AP and LP by 0/0 of all in the enemy fleet in class 4 but some ships are immune against destruction
(battle engine syntax: destroy,enemy,all,4)
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
Dragonspawn
1st Lieutenant
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 35
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2003 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought thisll be an interesting ship!
But maybe I should have made it Self Destruct... what do you all think? |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
JaM
Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2003 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ever heard of a mantis. 
So no, I don't think this ship is needed. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2003 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@:jam
yes you are right! we don't need this ship! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Dragonspawn
1st Lieutenant
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 35
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2003 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It isnt the same. And Jam, have you EVER i mean EVER approved a post?
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
kamekaze6
Admiral
Joined: 12 Aug 2003
Posts: 1312
Location: Malta
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2003 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jeez thats alot of manpower anyway this ship would destroy buildings.
personally i would enjoy being attacked by this its armour is thin and look at all them points!!! anyway like they said the mantis is better i vote no
lol one cruiser vs this bzzzt -2000 points and you wouldnt gain that much from an attack against a few buildings |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
JaM
Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2003 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
On 2003-09-08 18:22, Dragonspawn wrote:
It isnt the same. And Jam, have you EVER i mean EVER approved a post?
|
Yes this time you're right. It isn't the same, the mantis is a much better ship 
And I NEVER approved a post of yours, but I did of others. 
BTW: I can't help it you reinvent a worse version of the mantis.
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
mackman
Vice Admiral
Joined: 15 Jan 2003
Posts: 597
Location: Orlando, Florida
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2003 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry dude but this ship is really bad.Who in there right mind is gonna spend 2000 mp to kill a class 4 ship??????DOH!
_________________
SBR A former -TO- empire member. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
JaM
Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Multies. So maybe dragonspawn is a multi
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Dragonspawn
1st Lieutenant
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 35
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| GTH JAM! Dont you DARE accuse me of cheating! I never did and never will cheat so BACK THE HELL OFF! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
kamekaze6
Admiral
Joined: 12 Aug 2003
Posts: 1312
Location: Malta
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| he is not a multi. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jam you wrong, is not an multi, is an FARMER
LOL!!!
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Dragonspawn
1st Lieutenant
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 35
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thats still an accusition. And it is the second time you accused me of it. (reference to Alliance technology sharing) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
JaM
Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
On 2003-09-09 11:20, Dragonspawn wrote:
GTH JAM! Dont you DARE accuse me of cheating! I never did and never will cheat so BACK THE HELL OFF!
|
I NEVER DID ACCUSE YOU OF CHEATING, but I said MABYE he's a multi. So a little less impulsive writing and a bit more carefully reading. 
BTW this way you make your own invention pretty off-topic 
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
JaM
Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think you overreacting now and shouldn't be so touchy. And Alliance technology sharing was another not so smart idea ). And you INSULT me in that topic and I did NOT accuse you.
And I didn't accuse now, and if you still think I did, I never ment to accuse you, . Maybe you don't have a visual browser or anyhow don't see the laughing smiley after my "accusation".
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2003 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
we don't need to speak about this ship!
its bad! nothing else! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2003 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stops the insults and the acusations... The round is end
I hope that the cheaters and farmers (don't specific) don't play with multiple account... Again
But i think that some years later, the Admin. can stop the multis (Well, i hope)
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
