| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Please vote |
| yes |
|
85% |
[ 12 ] |
| no |
|
14% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 14 |
|
| Author |
Message |
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what about having allianz probes in the next round?
that means:
all probes you and your allianz members have can be seen by everyone from your allianz!
Of course only you can destroy your probes and send them out no one else!
So, what do you think?
Greetings  |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
JaM
Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good idea, BUT only IF YOU have the option to set them private or alliance open.
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
s***
this option i forgot to post, thanks jam!
Greetings |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Lou of East from West
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 372
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
goooooooooooooooood
very good! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
blackmagic
Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| AHHH!! you took my idea! I was goin to post something like that, but there is a problem with this. Bigger alliances have the advantage. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
what do you mean with advantage?
Greetings |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Achilles
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 22 May 2003
Posts: 333
Location: Wisconsin-USA
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
He means that the bigger the alliance is, the bigger your com-lists will be. 10 members sending out probes brings you a lot more information than 5 members.
In theory, alliance members share probe data, anyways.
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Nemesis
Vice Admiral
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
Posts: 452
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2003 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I like it |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
blackmagic
Admiral
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 1157
Location: GP
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| you'll see wat i mean when i say i was going to post the same thing. Its a big thing about alliances and stuff.. real long =). I should have it done in a few days |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2003 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The spies can get more Com-list without doings ANYTHING.
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
BladeTech
Admiral
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 1591
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2003 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| the idea is good but too vulnerable |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Nikolai
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 27
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2003 6:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
What if only one of these probes can be built per alliance and only built by the alliance leader (much like the mobile TWG)?
_________________
Brother of the Shadow |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Nemesis
Vice Admiral
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
Posts: 452
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2003 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I like Nikolai's idea, but it should be one at a time,not just one per alliance, and the Minister of Communication(MoC) should build them |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Achilles
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 22 May 2003
Posts: 333
Location: Wisconsin-USA
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2003 4:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thats not a bad idea, to make it specific to the MoC. It can then be a specialized, powerful probe, like a cross between the investigation probe and the wide-scan probe. Warp 10 and scanradius 17. Since there would only be one per alliance it would not throw off the general probe balance.
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Nemesis
Vice Admiral
Joined: 03 Jun 2003
Posts: 452
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2003 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| scanradius 17 is too much, maybe 12 or 15 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
JaM
Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2003 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shouldn't it be possible for the alliance leader to set a member loyal or not.
Loyal members have access to the shared probe info, the alliance-attack code and alliance probe info, mTWG coords. Unloyal members don't get anything automaticly. This is also very handy to motivate some new members to be active.
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
imareed
Captain
Joined: 25 Mar 2003
Posts: 106
Location: California
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 2:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like the loyalty selection idea. Instead of a general probe - I think the alliance probe should be like the dsp. Only it provides readout for the whole alliance. MOC in charge is a good idea. 
_________________
SeaWolves move silent and attack in packs!
HH |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Nuclearmin
Captain
Joined: 25 Oct 2002
Posts: 132
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like this Idea, too, because to be MoC usually isnt very funny, except youre the Moc of Space Mercenaries, Inc.  |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
jeah thats right than you have al lot of work!
Greetings |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2003 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
11 Scanradius
Warp 11
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
