View previous topic :: View next topic |
this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
this can be added to the game |
|
72% |
[ 8 ] |
it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
no good try another one |
|
27% |
[ 3 ] |
|
Total Votes : 11 |
|
Author |
Message |
tec_server Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:41 pm Post subject: magnificent marlito |
|
|
magnificent marlito (class 1 ship)
the nanites have stolen eray technology and made it small. the took the doomstar and made it nano technology.
attack/life: 0/1
manpower: 40
researchtime: 2 d
buildingtime: 14 h
nanite-technology
needed research:
fanatic warfare
battle details:fights
(battle engine syntax: f)
modifies LP by -5000 of 200 ships of any ship-type in your own fleet in class 1, there are no known ships and buildings that survive this effect.
battlemessage: "mare kills his own ships!"
(battle engine syntax: obliterate,self,200,1,all,mare kills his own ships!,n)
modifies LP by -5000 of 100 ships of any ship-type in the enemy fleet in class 1, there are no known ships and buildings that survive this effect.
battlemessage: "mare blast away ... ships"
(battle engine syntax: obliterate,enemy,100,1,all,mare blast away )
modifies LP by -5000 of 5 ships of any ship-type in both fleets in class 2, there are no known ships and buildings that survive this effect.
battlemessage: "mare blast away ... ships"
(battle engine syntax: obliterate,both,5,2,all,mare blast away)
modifies LP by -5000 of 1 ship of any ship-type in both fleets in class 3, there are no known ships and buildings that survive this effect.
battlemessage: "mare blast away ... ships"
(battle engine syntax: obliterate,both,1,3,all,mare blast away)
self destructs!
(battle engine syntax: sd) |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Failtrip1 Vice Admiral
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 436
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Scolar Visari Captain
Joined: 13 Dec 2006 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Magnific-o _________________
Join Your Destiny |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
iuztheevil Commander
Joined: 02 Jun 2006 Posts: 86
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is perhaps one of the most awesome ships I have ever seen.... _________________ No don't kill it, I'm sure it's harmless..... |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
T2 Admiral
Joined: 26 Mar 2005 Posts: 1398 Location: Ontario
|
Posted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is good ship. Takes some thought on how to use it but well balanced I think. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Knight of Truth Admiral
Joined: 12 Jan 2006 Posts: 2011
|
Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I dont like the name... why dont you call it a nanostar? _________________ [img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/599/kot2ks1.jpg[/img]
MicroJak wrote: |
For fuck's sake would you both please stop fucking swearing!!!! |
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Failtrip1 Vice Admiral
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 436
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Knight of Truth Admiral
Joined: 12 Jan 2006 Posts: 2011
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
what? I mean... Magnificent Marlito? What kind of name is that? I dont go calling my ships Magnificent KOT. _________________ [img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/599/kot2ks1.jpg[/img]
MicroJak wrote: |
For fuck's sake would you both please stop fucking swearing!!!! |
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Dinskydude Admiral
Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 854 Location: Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Europe, Earth
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with KoT, i mean... maybe it's a fun name for a ship which doesn't really mean something, but i think this ship could be seriously used on a number of occasions, and i wouldn't really want to build a ship called "Magnificent Marlito"... I think this should be called the Nanostar aswell. _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
The Arbiter 2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 26 Jan 2007 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | This ship is unworthy of the name Nanostar! Call it the ARbiter machine or perish! |
_________________ Salvation has begun! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
T2 Admiral
Joined: 26 Mar 2005 Posts: 1398 Location: Ontario
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To all those who do not like the name of this ship, I suggest you do not use it !
The inventer has the sole right to name a ship what he or she chooses.
Because someone does not like a name is not reason for the ship to be dismissed.
I suggest those who do not like the name to invent a ship of their own that can stand the heavy critique it must endure to be admitted to the game.
You can then call it what you like.
P.S. This ship was NOT invented by Marlito but rather by someone else as a tribute to his skill, knowledge and fair gameplay. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
MicroJak Admiral
Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 2315 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Failtrip1 wrote: | Knight of Truth wrote: | I dont like the name... why dont you call it a nanostar? |
|
lol
I like the name,
If I were to create a ship that was better than the other which are rubbish most of the time, I would name it the Meloncholy MicroJak, becuase it would land and bring floods of tears which would destroy the clever electric technology of nano, somethings...
Or, The Magical MicroJak, An invisible ship that spins in the air and drops robo-rabbits on shipyards, were soilders would come out of the rabbits stomach and turn from invisible to visible whenever a ship attacks them....
Although then it would be a Magical MicroJak Carrier, and the Magical MicroJak's would be the bunnies.
Nice ship Marlito! _________________
Quote: | When you're good you're very good, but when you're bad you're better. |
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Scolar Visari Captain
Joined: 13 Dec 2006 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
T2 wrote: | To all those who do not like the name of this ship, I suggest you do not use it !
The inventer has the sole right to name a ship what he or she chooses.
Because someone does not like a name is not reason for the ship to be dismissed.
I suggest those who do not like the name to invent a ship of their own that can stand the heavy critique it must endure to be admitted to the game.
You can then call it what you like.
P.S. This ship was NOT invented by Marlito but rather by someone else as a tribute to his skill, knowledge and fair gameplay. |
YEAH!! btw, i made it to contribute Marlito aka Mare/Failtrip1's skill, knowledge and fair gameplay.
Also not to forget his great wisdom!
And the name doesnt matter, its the ship... like why do they call a banana and "banana"? or a orange an "Orange"? Names are just to classify an object _________________
Join Your Destiny |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Posts: 1422
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Once and again excelent...but as commonly i think we should do some little changes.
Race: Nanite
Research Time 2d
Building Time: 12-13h
Research Needed : Nano-technology
Now at least we that syntax it should estabilish a position about destroying or not destroying other "magnificent marlito"
IF it will destroy other "MM"; manpower 50
IF it wont destroy other "MM"; manpower 75-80.
This is like the evaporator 2, a ship, that if is added it will change in a radical way vet and some other's strategies.
Congratulations. The first one i really accept in years. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Knight of Truth Admiral
Joined: 12 Jan 2006 Posts: 2011
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 10:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
i believe they call oranges oranges, because there orange. _________________ [img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/599/kot2ks1.jpg[/img]
MicroJak wrote: |
For fuck's sake would you both please stop fucking swearing!!!! |
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Noxus Vice Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2006 Posts: 493 Location: Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yet again, another ship that could be useful and change up the gameplay a bit
Rubens wrote: | Once and again excelent...but as commonly i think we should do some little changes.
Race: Nanite
Research Time 2d
Building Time: 12-13h
Research Needed : Nano-technology
Now at least we that syntax it should estabilish a position about destroying or not destroying other "magnificent marlito"
IF it will destroy other "MM"; manpower 50
IF it wont destroy other "MM"; manpower 75-80.
This is like the evaporator 2, a ship, that if is added it will change in a radical way vet and some other's strategies.
Congratulations. The first one i really accept in years. |
i agree with the mp.. 50-60ish.. but it destroys other "Magnificant Marlitos" in the syntax or this might be stacked.. _________________ -==Frag the Weak, Hurdle the Dead.==- |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Failtrip1 Vice Admiral
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 436
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Jack09 Vice Admiral
Joined: 28 Dec 2008 Posts: 504 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like the ship, but the Magnificent Marlito, look at this:
1 Magnificent Marlito vs 100 Fighters
Your Losses:
-
Enemy Losses:
100 Fighters
Score: 100,
I mean that is pretty bad, you just got your ass kicked by the magnificent marlito, thats pretty cool, i like it, put it on research or on pre warps like mare said. _________________ 11/11/11 |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
MicroJak Admiral
Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 2315 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MicroJak wrote: | Failtrip1 wrote: | Knight of Truth wrote: | I dont like the name... why dont you call it a nanostar? |
|
lol
I like the name,
If I were to create a ship that was better than the other which are rubbish most of the time, I would name it the Meloncholy MicroJak, becuase it would land and bring floods of tears which would destroy the clever electric technology of nano, somethings...
Or, The Magical MicroJak, An invisible ship that spins in the air and drops robo-rabbits on shipyards, were soilders would come out of the rabbits stomach and turn from invisible to visible whenever a ship attacks them....
Although then it would be a Magical MicroJak Carrier, and the Magical MicroJak's would be the bunnies.
Nice ship Marlito! |
Sometimes it amazes me how ****ed I sound in my earlier posts.
Robo rabbits? Magical MicroJak Carrier? What the fuck was I on?
As for the ship.. if Failtrip made it.. it must be good. But I don't see the point of even suggesting that it should be added.. and this is to prove a point.. when was the last time a 'suggested' ship actually became a reality? I think we should have a competition of some sort, were everyone who enters created some sort of ship and the one with the highest votes must be implemented. Otherwise I don't see the point of this forum. It's just a waste of time and space and posts. _________________
Quote: | When you're good you're very good, but when you're bad you're better. |
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Failtrip1 Vice Admiral
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 436
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didnt invent this ship.I just want to try it out.
Of topic
Admins regulary(in ST regularly means twice a year )puts new ships on planets but to be honest Im going throe this forum and I have put like more then 30 ships (they were really bad and without syntax)in impossible invention and I have come across of only 1 semi decent new invention.
So its hard to put anything on planets if nothing new doesnt pop up. _________________ http://toptenproxysites.com/
http://www.chooseyourproxy.com/ |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
|