 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
20% |
[ 1 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
60% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 5 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:00 pm Post subject: weapons of mass destruction |
|
|
weapons of mass destruction (class 4 ship)
blows itself up, and every ship around it. even if on own team.
attack/life: 0/6000
manpower: 2500
speed: warp 2
(can only establish a warpfield for itself)
researchtime: 4 d
buildingtime: 1 d
 nanite-technology
needed research:
improved targeting
battle details:
modifies LP by -5000 of 10000 ships of any ship-type in both fleets in all classes, there are no known ships and buildings that survive this effect.
(battle engine syntax: obliterate,both,10000,all,all) |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Knight of Truth
Admiral
Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 2011
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So if you send one of these to an enemy base, 50% chance you fire first and blow away his entire base/fleet?
Sounds like an upgraded Doomstar to me.
Also, this technology is more fitting to the Humans.
The doomstar is balanced, because it does not blow up c4, so no suicide building runs. This is not.
That's my opinion, anyway.
_________________
[img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/599/kot2ks1.jpg[/img]
| MicroJak wrote: |
For fuck's sake would you both please stop fucking swearing!!!! |
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
MicroJak
Admiral
Joined: 27 Jun 2006
Posts: 2315
Location: London, UK
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That is true.... it will either blow up your fleet or their fleet in the first hit. It would be a very big target and perhaps a thing a multy would love to use. However if you changed it so that it didn't blow up buildings (otherwise it would be incredibly easy) Then it would be a doomstar with a warp.
Maybe you should name it the 'warpstar'
Well Done, but a few modifications are needed.
_________________
| Quote: | When you're good you're very good, but when you're bad you're better.  |
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Senor
Admiral
Joined: 12 Nov 2003
Posts: 1114
Location: estonia
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
there's no originality what-so-ever and besides its poorly constructed(6000 lp?!?)
it's not a good invention, try again. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
battlehard
2nd Lieutenant
Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:07 pm Post subject: :) |
|
|
It's not his bad idea - it was another of mine lol.
I am new and just wanted to try it out but am open to suggestions.
I think that an idea like a WMD would be great. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
imperial wizzard
2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 199
Location: Kerkrade (nl)
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i dont think we need a new type of doomstar.
_________________
!! TOTAL OWNAGE !! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
|
