Recent topics Log in
Search Profile
Memberlist Usergroups
Log in to check your private messages
Register
The Winners of the Era
Post new topic   Reply to topic
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » Bug Reports » The Winners of the Era
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Robert Roy
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 525
Location: Netherlands

 Post Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:49 pm    Post subject: The Winners of the Era
Reply with quote

I am complaining. The moment the Era ended, The Flying Dutchman still existed. Sectin had respawned, but I had personally made TFD the fourth place alliance of this Era.
I had made 100.000 pts in this alliance, so some TO with 7 k doesnt belong above me......


Same goes for the players. If you look at the Hall of Fame, two of Rubens his accounts are missing, Full of Contact also respawned that era, just as I did.

It should be:
- Demonios
- Windtalker
- Full
- Rubens
- RobertRoy
_________________
Nulla poena sine lege..
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Robert Roy
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 525
Location: Netherlands

 Post Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 4:52 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

These are the six best players respawned DURING the first Era:
Code:
1. Demonios rojos of Caracas FC 7      [golden]      06/06/2006      116469
2. windtalker of teepee     [PFIU]     06/05/2006     101099
3. Full of Contact     [TFP]     05/14/2006     98834
4. CFCRubens of CFC hincha     [temporary]     04/09/2006     82261
5. Robert Roy of Patrones Return     [TFD.]     03/22/2006     78774
6. Speaker-To-Animals of -Kzin-     [NZ]     05/09/2006     73324

_________________
Nulla poena sine lege..
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Ranirfac
Midshipman


Joined: 19 Feb 2006
Posts: 4

 Post Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:01 pm    Post subject: round points
Reply with quote

I'm not sure how many points were made in the first round, but I kinda agree with Roy. To me, it looks as if I was second and more should have made the list.

Admin, can you tell us how you came up with your figures? We all would like to know. I'm still quite new to the game.

 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
imperial wizzard
2nd Rear Admiral
2nd Rear Admiral


Joined: 08 Sep 2005
Posts: 199
Location: Kerkrade (nl)

 Post Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:46 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I agree to with Rob, if theres a list of Best Alliance, there also shut be a list of best player. The only problem is, the only way to decide wich player is the best at the end of a era, is when every player starts a new account at the begin of a new era. Other wise if player X makes a score of 150k, and plays only a week in a new era, probably he will be the best player of the era if now one beats his score during the era.

if every one will start at the beginning of a era and respawns at the end, then you can call the player at number one the best player, because every one has the same gaming time.
_________________
!! TOTAL OWNAGE !!
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Robert Roy
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 525
Location: Netherlands

 Post Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:26 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

imperial wizzard wrote:
because every one has the same gaming time.

They all got 100 days. Cause it was the first era ever, what I suggest is better than copying the top10 at the end of the era. Cause people that respawn halfway would never make it to the top.

Admin plz make a good top10 of players, and a top10 of alliances.
_________________
Nulla poena sine lege..
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Connor McCloud
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 916
Location: Netherlands

 Post Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:39 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Well my score was made completly in the first ERA but I still have 8% to go so the best player in admin list isn't the 1 who scored the most in the first ERA just the ones that eneded their EVO in the first ERA so it is not realistic to call it the best player of the ERA
_________________
Greetz Connor


 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
lilkrnboi1018
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 16 Apr 2005
Posts: 1182
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

 Post Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 2:25 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

i completely agree, new system kinda stinks
_________________
PWNAGE!

Gotta love the Magnum (RE 0-3)
Or the Eagle (RE 3)
Leader of DEFIANCE
The grounds are soaked... with your blood!
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Robert Roy
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 525
Location: Netherlands

 Post Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 7:37 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Connor McCloud wrote:
just the ones that eneded their EVO in the first ERA so it is not realistic to call it the best player of the ERA

Connor be realistic. That system would be much harder to implement.

Fact is that a lot of people simply are left out of this list, which isn't a good thing. People who fought REALLY hard, were very active, who scored around 80 k or even 100 k and still didn't make it to that list.....
_________________
Nulla poena sine lege..
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Robert Roy
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 525
Location: Netherlands

 Post Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:53 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

I just looked a bit more, and I guess it should be like the following:

Quote:
1. Demonios rojos of Caracas FC 7 [golden] 06/06/2006 116469
2. windtalker of teepee [PFIU] 06/05/2006 101099
3. Full of Contact [TFP] 05/14/2006 98834
4. CFCRubens of CFC hincha [temporary] 04/09/2006 82261
5. Robert Roy of Patrones Return [TFD.] 03/22/2006 78774
6. Speaker-To-Animals of -Kzin- [NZ] 05/09/2006 73324
7. Raanit of the Anter Belt [kindergarden] 05/28/2006 66302
8. Hammond of Stargate Command [PFIU] 05/12/2006 63629
9. AstroSlayer of ...Mericuto [Nisiettes] 04/03/2006 58412
10. DavAlan of ArcataCal [NZ] 04/26/2006 55400
11. Le Creme of Chocolate Cake [TFP] 06/15/2006 52624
12. Point of The Arrow [NZ] 04/22/2006 48155
13. ReneeADavis of LautemTL [NZ] 04/14/2006 47200
14. Ailriss of Rominicul [nomercy] 03/24/2006 46329
15. Lord Thorns of Mist of thorns [RED thorns] 06/02/2006  30611
16. Duo of Duality [B-Garden] 06/06/2006 13191
17. Frilla of Frictitr Decimus [PFIU] 05/28/2006 12433
18. Sectin of Ecteli [TFD.] 06/13/2006 10585
19. Fiddler of Frost Sands [reps] 04/12/2006 5875
20. Skip of HR MS KD I [NightFall] 03/03/2006 5328




Best alliances
Quote:
- TFP
score:429798 members:9 huntscore:2

- NeutralZone
score:312359 members:8 huntscore:4

- Powerfull Inforcers of Universe
score:281770 members:11 huntscore:2

- The Flying Dutchman
score: around 114 k members:2 huntscore:0

- Total Ownage
score:7976 members:3 huntscore:3

_________________
Nulla poena sine lege..
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Connor McCloud
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 916
Location: Netherlands

 Post Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 8:55 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Robert Roy wrote:

Connor be realistic. That system would be much harder to implement.



Don't post a best player of the ERA cause they aren't , I will respawn in the nest ERA wich will place me in the top of the next ERA . But it could be possible that I won't score that much in the new ERA . this isn't the right way to make a top player of the ERA list . if can't take the score from a player made only in that ERA the list isn't right to call best player of the ERA

BTW , you don't seem to like me missed me in the hall for your list
Storming C of McCl-land [TFP] 03/26/2006 67150
_________________
Greetz Connor


 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
spacetrace
Board Admin
Board Admin


Joined: 24 Dec 2001
Posts: 1624

 Post Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:20 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

we are working on this !

the data is in all stored in the database, and we will correct the winners list

TFD was not counted for highscore because it had only 2 members. We set the limit to 3 members. we added TFP to the list, but we are unsure if we should set the limit for a real alliance to 3 .
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Knight of Truth
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 2011

 Post Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 10:34 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

no, you shouldnt, cause its a tactic, theil have no flag, and they cant lose it, but they dont have a lot of players that can score. the minimun should be 2.
_________________
[img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/599/kot2ks1.jpg[/img]

MicroJak wrote:

For fuck's sake would you both please stop fucking swearing!!!!
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
spacetrace
Board Admin
Board Admin


Joined: 24 Dec 2001
Posts: 1624

 Post Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 11:03 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Knight of Truth wrote:
no, you shouldnt, cause its a tactic, theil have no flag, and they cant lose it, but they dont have a lot of players that can score. the minimun should be 2.


but that tactic is just a exploitation of a rule-gap. i think we need to change it.
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Knight of Truth
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 12 Jan 2006
Posts: 2011

 Post Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 2:39 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

well im out of ideas.

@connor: its era, not ERA, era doesnt stand for anything.
_________________
[img]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/599/kot2ks1.jpg[/img]

MicroJak wrote:

For fuck's sake would you both please stop fucking swearing!!!!
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Connor McCloud
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 15 Jun 2004
Posts: 916
Location: Netherlands

 Post Posted: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:26 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

@ Knight of Truth it is Connor and not connor , Connor stands for something
_________________
Greetz Connor


 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
admin
Board Admin
Board Admin


Joined: 09 Jan 2002
Posts: 2938

 Post Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:50 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

sorry it took so long, but here are the real winners:
http://www.spacetrace.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=62671#62671
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Rubens
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422

 Post Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:36 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Again...what are the bases to put those as the real winners...If it is about in which era did you respawn, Demonios was 110k.
I still cant understand it, there are other players with good score too...On what is this based?:S
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Robert Roy
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral


Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 525
Location: Netherlands

 Post Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:40 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

All players that respawned during that Era. Demonios doesn't count cause it is still kept alive.
_________________
Nulla poena sine lege..
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Rubens
Admiral
Admiral


Joined: 20 Apr 2003
Posts: 1422

 Post Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:52 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Robert Roy wrote:
All players that respawned during that Era. Demonios doesn't count cause it is still kept alive.


No problem there:D

So it has to be deleted:P?
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
admin
Board Admin
Board Admin


Joined: 09 Jan 2002
Posts: 2938

 Post Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 10:41 am    Post subject:

admin wrote:
sorry, it is really strange, but the real winner seems to be missing:

1. Demonios rojos of Caracas FC 7 [golden] 06/06/2006 116469

(we will check, what went wrong)
 Back to top »
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
SpaceTrace Forum Forum Index » Bug Reports » The Winners of the Era
Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Solaris phpBB theme/template by Jakob Persson
Copyright © Jakob Persson 2003



Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group

Impressum