| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
capjbadger
1st Lieutenant
Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 32
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whats going on with the sub-battle total? Shouldn't the class 1 vs class 4 battle total 391? At least the final score worked... 
----------------------------------------
2003-07-03 07:41:38
your fleet 1 fights against the base from ************** at ***/***/**
03.07 07:41:01 - your fleet arrived
yours: 1241 ships
class 1:
1 fighter (1/1, 1 MP)
1200 kamikaze (35/1, 1 MP)
class 2:
33 destroyers (10/10, 8 MP)
class 3:
1 cruiser (100/100, 60 MP)
5 dreadnoughts (200/500, 375 MP)
class 4:
1 mothership (0/1000, 320 MP)
enemy: 0 ships
class 4:
buildings:
1 transwarp-network (0/100, 0 MP)
1 research center (0/3500, 0 MP)
1 shipyard (0/3500, 0 MP)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
your class 1 vs enemy class 4: V ^
you:
1 fighter
1200 kamikaze
enemy:
1 shipyard
1 research center
1 transwarp-network
203 kamikaze destroy 406 ships
100 kamikaze vs 1 research center
100 kamikaze vs 1 shipyard
3 kamikaze vs 1 transwarp-network
losses:
you :
609 kamikaze
enemy :
1 shipyard
1 research center
1 transwarp-network
score in this subbattle: -609
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
summary:
your losses:
class 1:
609 kamikaze
enemy losses:
class 4:
buildings:
1 research center
1 transwarp-network
1 shipyard
score: 391
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it is no bug everything ok! 
Greetings |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
wizz
2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 10 Sep 2002
Posts: 151
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
@masterp: why is it ok?
i think its not ok.. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Nuclearmin
Captain
Joined: 25 Oct 2002
Posts: 132
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I made the experience that buildings are not included in Subbattle-Scores. But the final score is correct. I think this is what masterp wanted to say. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Bogart
Captain
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 144
Location: Round Three
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2003 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the answer is Here Because the buildings have no mp in themselves, the class one fight against them shows as a loss (the kamis that blew themselves up), but the "score" for the destroyed buildings comes at the end of the report.
_________________
Col.(ret.) Bogart. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2003 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeah sorry you are right it is a bug!
Greetings |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
masterp
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 11 Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2003 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
@bogart:
but he must get 100 points more! |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Bogart
Captain
Joined: 12 Feb 2003
Posts: 144
Location: Round Three
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2003 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
On 2003-07-04 01:37, masterp wrote:
@bogart:
but he must get 100 points more!
|
I assume you mean the transwarp, but that does not give score.
_________________
Col.(ret.) Bogart. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
capjbadger
1st Lieutenant
Joined: 27 May 2003
Posts: 32
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 04, 2003 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ahhh... I see now. No mp for the buildings, but they still give points. The sub-battle totals only count mp loses.
Thanks guys.  |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
darklim
Admiral
Joined: 15 May 2003
Posts: 1154
Location: Caracas, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2003 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Destroying Trans Warp is not for point...
Is for future attack 
To make angry the aliance of the enemy 
And you can laugh 
The TransWarp is an defensive gate, used to the ally reach the base more faster to intercept enemy fleet
But is it destroyed... 
The ally can't reach before of the second attack
LOL
_________________
The Spam Master of the Spam Alliance |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
