 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
| this can be added to the game |
|
25% |
[ 1 ] |
| it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| no good try another one |
|
75% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 4 |
|
| Author |
Message |
tec_server
Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 1746
|
 Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heavy fighter (class 1 ship)
more stronger and expensive than a basic fighter.
attack/life: 4/5
manpower: 9
researchtime: 1 d
buildingtime: 18 h
needed research:
advanced tactics
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
BladeTech
Admiral
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 1591
|
| Posted: Wed May 28, 2003 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i say no. but that is just me. |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
JaM
Admiral
Joined: 23 Mar 2003
Posts: 1300
|
| Posted: Thu May 29, 2003 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are we in the 'heavy' trend? How many ships are going to be heavy?
|
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
Bilerator
1st Rear Admiral
Joined: 10 Jan 2002
Posts: 203
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Thu May 29, 2003 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
1. Too many mp, definitetly.
1/1 = 1 mp 4/5 = 9 mp ? There's no reason ..
2. There should be extras .. the normal ships are a bit wasted *g* |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
BladeTech
Admiral
Joined: 10 Feb 2003
Posts: 1591
|
| Posted: Thu May 29, 2003 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yea |
|
| Back to top » |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
|
