Author |
Message |
Topic: destroyer 2.0 |
robert
Replies: 9
Views: 7701
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:23 am Subject: destroyer 2.0 |
When I was making this ship, the inventor screen thing said 56 mp was to low, and I thought 60 mp was too high. Maybe it should cost 60 or more mp.
[ This Message was edited by: robert on 2003-11-22 ... |
Topic: inscect force |
robert
Replies: 10
Views: 9975
|
Forum: Impossible inventions Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2003 2:06 am Subject: inscect force |
USELESS. |
Topic: destroyer 2.0 |
robert
Replies: 9
Views: 7701
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 1:25 am Subject: destroyer 2.0 |
Actually, I was only trying to create a desroyer like a Dreadnought only weaker. Ok, I admit the "restart" was a bit much. I got frustrated from trying to create this ship like a dread. Maby ... |
Topic: sonar probe |
robert
Replies: 12
Views: 13531
|
Forum: Impossible inventions Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 1:13 am Subject: sonar probe |
I like it. |
Topic: destroyer 2.0 |
robert
Replies: 9
Views: 7701
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 12:58 am Subject: destroyer 2.0 |
I actually forgot to put that in the description. So, sorry for not putting that in. Thanks for telling me. |
Topic: destroyer 2.0 |
robert
Replies: 9
Views: 7701
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2003 12:45 am Subject: destroyer 2.0 |
I tried to make this ship balanced, so tell me if it isn't. |
Topic: ultimate weapon |
robert
Replies: 12
Views: 12908
|
Forum: Impossible inventions Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2003 1:23 am Subject: ultimate weapon |
No. This ship is too powerful. |
Topic: ALLIANCE DIPLOMACY, IMPROVEMENTS, AND ADDITIONS |
robert
Replies: 78
Views: 70342
|
Forum: Suggestions Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2003 2:33 am Subject: ALLIANCE DIPLOMACY, IMPROVEMENTS, AND ADDITIONS |
I like the ideas. I vote yes. |
Topic: university (building) |
robert
Replies: 16
Views: 14989
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2003 10:35 pm Subject: university (building) |
I like this building. I think it should be added. |
Topic: Warp .5 |
robert
Replies: 10
Views: 12004
|
Forum: Suggestions Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2003 4:05 pm Subject: Warp .5 |
I agree. I think It is stupid that ships, that don't have a warp drive, can't move anywhere.
[ This Message was edited by: robert on 2003-08-19 17:07 ] |
Topic: mmls |
robert
Replies: 14
Views: 13407
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2003 6:02 am Subject: mmls |
What is unbalanced about it? |
Topic: mmls |
robert
Replies: 14
Views: 13407
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2003 6:01 am Subject: mmls |
What is unbalanced about it? |
Topic: dooms day device |
robert
Replies: 14
Views: 16029
|
Forum: Impossible inventions Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 10:36 pm Subject: dooms day device |
it is not supposed to be built/ created. It was somewhat of a joke. Vote no. |
Topic: h.m.s belfast |
robert
Replies: 13
Views: 10033
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 1:07 am Subject: h.m.s belfast |
It is not a class 2. It just shields other class ones in your fleet. It just helps class 1 ships destroy a blockade runner or something
[ This Message was edited by: robert on 2003-07-27 02:08 ] |
Topic: h.m.s belfast |
robert
Replies: 13
Views: 10033
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 12:36 am Subject: h.m.s belfast |
It is supossed to fight the class 1 ships. It just has the manpower of a hammer. It is supossed to be able to take the fire from the other class 1, so other fighters in your fleet can fight with out g ... |
|