Author |
Message |
Topic: hyper mothership invention |
SirNeil
Replies: 58
Views: 53873
|
Forum: old topics Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:46 am Subject: hyper mothership invention |
or it could reconstruct x number of class 1 and/or x number of class two in each fleet |
Topic: hyper mothership invention |
SirNeil
Replies: 58
Views: 53873
|
Forum: old topics Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2004 2:43 am Subject: hyper mothership invention |
How bout this for a ship like this: (i'm not really in an invetive mood so i'm not gonna get into any detail) It gives additinal AP/LP to ALL ships in class 1 and/or class 2. With resonably low mp it ... |
Topic: hyper mothership |
SirNeil
Replies: 26
Views: 33415
|
Forum: All existing Technologies Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 1:36 am Subject: hyper mothership |
Its definitly not ment to self destruct. Alterations in mp/lp maybe, but not self destruct. |
Topic: High Command Admiral |
SirNeil
Replies: 17
Views: 13272
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 1:26 am Subject: High Command Admiral |
Maybe you could have it "encourage" people to spend more points on it. Like 10 points gets you 1 ap, but if you spend 50 points you get 10 ap. Or something along those lines. |
Topic: hyper mothership invention |
SirNeil
Replies: 58
Views: 53873
|
Forum: old topics Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 11:29 am Subject: hyper mothership invention |
Could do that, but I do not know how. |
Topic: hyper mothership invention |
SirNeil
Replies: 58
Views: 53873
|
Forum: old topics Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2004 2:56 am Subject: hyper mothership invention |
Once again I'd like to make it clear that syntax is just there to get the point across that the invention would not allow any class 1 or class 2. If this invention is accepted it would be necessary fo ... |
Topic: hyper mothership invention |
SirNeil
Replies: 58
Views: 53873
|
Forum: old topics Posted: Mon May 31, 2004 10:13 pm Subject: hyper mothership invention |
The syntax is like that because I have no way (in my knowledge) to make the syntax destroy ships when it goes into warp through the option the research creater gives. |
Topic: archangel dreadnought |
SirNeil
Replies: 18
Views: 16696
|
Forum: Impossible inventions Posted: Mon May 31, 2004 3:33 am Subject: archangel dreadnought |
They need to make a vote box "No good, and don't try again" |
Topic: pretty girl from down the lane |
SirNeil
Replies: 37
Views: 33484
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Sat May 29, 2004 3:15 am Subject: pretty girl from down the lane |
Well these joke ships are horrible and I see little to know humor in them. |
Topic: pretty girl from down the lane |
SirNeil
Replies: 37
Views: 33484
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Thu May 27, 2004 11:00 pm Subject: pretty girl from down the lane |
Ummm... she really isn't hot... and the ship really isn't good... maybe you should stop trying? |
Topic: scorpion assault craft |
SirNeil
Replies: 15
Views: 15747
|
Forum: Impossible inventions Posted: Thu May 27, 2004 10:55 pm Subject: scorpion assault craft |
I like how this ship is a prophet... only without the drawbacks... (Try another one) |
Topic: tactical flagship |
SirNeil
Replies: 11
Views: 10189
|
Forum: New Technology Inventions Posted: Sun May 23, 2004 10:22 pm Subject: tactical flagship |
It is like a fleet tender... only it can't blow up your entire fleet... and it has a cloak field... |
Topic: Researchtime must be shorter! Better for ST |
SirNeil
Replies: 16
Views: 15720
|
Forum: General Discussion Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2004 11:43 am Subject: Researchtime must be shorter! Better for ST |
Maybe an invention could be added that would move MP into the research field, thus making research faster but giving you less MP. |
|